Quantcast
BROWSE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
Corsair PC3500 XMS Memory
 
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
Brian Kristensen
Kurtis
Corsair
Apr. 1, 2004
Test Rig:

  • Pentium 4 2.4c
  • ABIT IC7-MAX3
  • PowerColor Radeon 9800 XT (Catalyst 4.2)
  • 200 GB Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9
  • LiteOn 16X DVD-ROM
  • Soyo Raptor 400W Power Supply
  • Windows XP Professional (latest updates)

SiSoft Sandra 2004

Our first test is Sandra's memory benchmark. The results are purely theoretical and may not accurately represent real-world performance.

SiSoft Sandra
(Show All Graphs)
Memory Bandwidth Int Memory Bandwidth Float
Corsair XMS PC3500 @ 400 MHz (Single)
Corsair XMS PC3500 @ 433 MHz (Single)
Corsair XMS PC3500 @ 433 MHz (Dual)
Crucial PC3400 @ 400 MHz (Single)
3006
3247
5179
2998
0
(MB/s)
6000
 
 
Memory Bandwidth Int Memory Bandwidth Float
Corsair XMS PC3500 @ 400 MHz (Single)
Corsair XMS PC3500 @ 433 MHz (Single)
Corsair XMS PC3500 @ 433 MHz (Dual)
Crucial PC3400 @ 400 MHz (Single)
3003
3250
5181
2991
0
(MB/s)
6000
 
 

With the Corsair PC3500 clocked at 400 MHz (PC3200 speeds), it performs on par with the Crucial PC3200. Compare those results to the Corsair at 433 MHz, and there is a nice performance increase. And as you would expect, when using two channels, there is a much, much larger increase in speed.

Aida32

AIDA32 has a built in benchmark that tests the theoretical read/write bandwidth of system memory. Like Sandra, the results may vary from the memory's real-world performance.

Aida32
(Show All Graphs)
Memory Read Access Memory Write Access
Corsair XMS PC3500 @ 400 MHz (Single)
Corsair XMS PC3500 @ 433 MHz (Single)
Corsair XMS PC3500 @ 433 MHz (Dual)
Crucial PC3200 @ 400 MHz (Single)
3016
3274
4994
3046
0
(MB/s)
6000
 
 
Memory Read Access Memory Write Access
Corsair XMS PC3500 @ 400 MHz (Single)
Corsair XMS PC3500 @ 433 MHz (Single)
Corsair XMS PC3500 @ 433 MHz (Dual)
Crucial PC3200 @ 400 MHz (Single)
1215
1320
1624
1178
0
(MB/s)
6000
 
 

The results of the Read Bandwidth benchmark show results much like those given by Sandra.

 
<< Previous
Page 4 of 6
Next >>
Page 1: Introduction
Page 2: A Closer Look
Page 3: Overclocking / Test System
Page 4: SiSoft Sandra 04 / Aida32
Page 5: PCMark04 / ScienceMark2
Page 6: Super Pi / Conclusion

13 User Comments
1 - Posted by Kurtis on May 26, 2003 - 9:28 pm

Me likey memory. Memory go vroom vroom. Fast memory poppie wheelie... ok anyway, this memory is badass. Check out the review

2 - Posted by brbubba on May 27, 2003 - 9:59 pm

Hmmm couldn't get it running at 200+ mhz. I have the Corsair 3200 XMS and I have gotten it running nicely at 200 mhz on an Asus a7n8x deluxe. Haven't tried going higher though. :roll:

3 - Posted by Brian on May 27, 2003 - 10:35 pm

We are getting an NF2 Ultra mobo in a few weeks, and we shall see how it does on that.

4 - Posted by keithwalton on May 29, 2003 - 5:52 am

Just like to say im running a pair of that memory (with silver heat spreaders) in my current system. which is a P4 2.4 'C' running at 3Ghz on a epox 4pca3+ mobo (i875p)
Nice speeds if i do say so myself :-)

http://www.soton.ac.uk/~kajw102/mem.JPG

K

Edit i forgot to mention thats running at 1Ghz FSB, with memory on a 5:4 ratio (400Mhz) with timings of 2-5-2-2

5 - Posted by Kurtis on May 29, 2003 - 12:30 pm

:shock: yeah me too... yeah... :cry:

6 - Posted by ChefJoe on June 10, 2003 - 9:09 pm

Two weeks later. NF2 ?

7 - Posted by Brian on June 10, 2003 - 9:29 pm

I have the NF II Ultra board in front of me right now. I am fairly busy though, so I cannot tell you when we will test the ram on it. Soon though.

I am looking forward to it as much as you all :-)

8 - Posted by ChefJoe on August 6, 2003 - 11:02 am

bump

9 - Posted by Kurtis on August 6, 2003 - 12:17 pm

soon, very soon :)

10 - Posted by MaNiAk21 on August 6, 2003 - 2:00 pm

Manufacturer? Model? So we can change our, 'Can't wait for the Nf2U review' to 'Can't wait for the [Manu] [Model] review.' :)

11 - Posted by Kurtis on August 6, 2003 - 2:03 pm

DFI NF2 Ultra LanParty Motherboard

12 - Posted by MaNiAk21 on August 6, 2003 - 2:05 pm

Oh, and... MIDGETS! MIDGETS! haha

13 - Posted by AkXb70 on April 2, 2004 - 10:16 pm

Throughout the review, you said DDR400 was PC3400, this isnt true as DDR400 is PC3200 if you would read the specs on current motherboards and if you multiply the 400X8, which is where PCxxxx ratings come in

Add Comment

To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.

Username: *


Password: (optional)
(Remember my login information: )

Comment: *


What is 6+2?: *