Albatron PX865PE Lite Pro i848P

Reviews: Hardware

Motherboards | Power Supplies | Memory | Systems | Video Cards

Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:

Nicholas Hart
Kurtis
Albatron
May. 14, 2004

<< Previous

Next >>

PCMark 04

PCMark uses typical desktop applications to gauge productivity performance.

PCMark 04

System Benchmark

Albatron PX865PE Lite

DFI PRO875B

Intel D875PBZ

4930

5122

5128

(PCMarks)

6500

The Albatron board is about 4% slower than the 875 chipset boards.

Aquamark 03

With the tagline "The Reality Benchmark', Aquamark 3 tests DirectX 9, 8 and 7 functions that modern games use to give an idea of how well a system will perform.

Aquamark 03
(Show All Graphs)

Graphics

CPU

TriScore

Albatron PX865PE Lite

DFI PRO875B

Intel D875PBZ

6030

6099

6138

Aquamarks

55000

Graphics

CPU

TriScore

Albatron PX865PE Lite

DFI PRO875B

Intel D875PBZ

8628

9263

9553

Aquamarks

55000

Graphics

CPU

TriScore

Albatron PX865PE Lite

DFI PRO875B

Intel D875PBZ

44689

45895

46458

Aquamarks

55000

Again, the Albatron board is marginally slower.

<< Previous

Page 6 of 10

Next >>

Page 1: Introduction
Page 2: Board Layout / Features
Page 3: Accessories / Extras
Page 4: BIOS
Page 5: Test System / Benchmarks
Page 6: Benchmarks: PCMark04 / Aquamark 03
Page 7: Benchmarks: Aida32 / Sandra 04
Page 8: Benchmarks: SpecViewPerf 7.1 / ScienceMark 2.0
Page 9: Benchmarks: Winbench 99 / UT2k3
Page 10: Overclocking / Conclusion

Subscribe to Motherboards [more info]

Add Comment

2 User Comments

1 - Posted by EmoMakesMeCry on May 16, 2004 - 12:48 pm

i have an Albatron 865PE Pro, not the lite variant, and i had a bit of a problem with it.

when i bought it with a processor i got a great deal on it so i figured, why not? but i also bought a SATA hard drive to use as my one and only drive since the board had the support for it. bad news when i put my machine together...the board's SATA ports wouldn't work. so i snooped around online looking for answers and guess what?....the board needed a bios update for the SATA ports to be functional...

makes me wish i had stuck with Abit like i had intended to.

but i must say, my albatron is excellent for overclocking.

2 - Posted by Nick on May 17, 2004 - 11:17 am

I had the same problem, although I won't say the SATA ports 'didn't work', I simply couldnt boot. I could see them in the bios, but when I had the system set to enhanced, it wouldnt boot. Leaving the system in legacy mode (as for linux or older OS's) the system would boot.

Same as you though, upgrade the bios and it works fine. A little too fine for an $80 board ;) I can honestly say I was surprised at how well the board worked being so cheap compared to the boards I was comparing it too.

Add Comment

To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.