Quantcast
BROWSE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
Corsair TwinX PC3200 XL Pro (2-2-2-5) DDR Memory
 
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
Brian Kristensen
Kurtis
Corsair
Aug. 21, 2004
Test System

Pentium 4 2.4c
ABIT IC7-MAX3
ATI Radeon X800 Pro 256 MB
160 GB SATA Seagate Barracuda (8 MB cache)
LiteOn 16X DVD-ROM
Soyo Raptor 400W Power Supply
Windows XP Professional (all the latest updates except Service Pack 2 installed)

ScienceMark 2

ScienceMark2 is a rather interesting utility which uses mathematical calculations to benchmark the CPU and memory. The ScienceMark 2 tests I used were the standard memory benchmark, Cipher, Molecular Dynamics and Primordia tests. ScienceMark 2 times how long it takes to process different scientific equations. The memory bandwidth benchmark is measured in MB/s; the higher the better. The other three tests output the time it took in seconds; lower is better.

ScienceMark 2
Memory Bandwidth
Mushkin PC3200 LII V2 @ 200 MHz
Corsair PC3200 XL Pro @ 200 MHz
Corsair PC3200 XL Pro @ 209 MHz
Corsair PC3200 XL Pro @ 254 MHz
4168.32
4106.77
4288.63
5136.80
0
(seconds)
7500
 
 

ScienceMark 2
(Show All Graphs)
Cipher Moldyn Primordia
Mushkin PC3200 LII V2 @ 200 MHz
Corsair PC3200 XL Pro @ 200 MHz
Corsair PC3200 XL Pro @ 209 MHz
Corsair PC3200 XL Pro @ 254 MHz
18.35
18.46
17.52
14.38
0
(seconds)
750
 
 
Cipher Moldyn Primordia
Mushkin PC3200 LII V2 @ 200 MHz
Corsair PC3200 XL Pro @ 200 MHz
Corsair PC3200 XL Pro @ 209 MHz
Corsair PC3200 XL Pro @ 254 MHz
119.91
119.46
118.76
96.21
0
(seconds)
750
 
 
Cipher Moldyn Primordia
Mushkin PC3200 LII V2 @ 200 MHz
Corsair PC3200 XL Pro @ 200 MHz
Corsair PC3200 XL Pro @ 209 MHz
Corsair PC3200 XL Pro @ 254 MHz
545.85
550.98
524.50
433.10
0
(seconds)
750
 
 

The majority of the ScienceMark tests show a significant increase in performance from the extra 9 MHz at 2-2-2-5. At stock speeds, the Corsair and Mushkin still perform about the same.

Super Pi

Super Pi calculates the infamous number pi from 16 thousand all the way up to 32 million digits! For our testing purposes we decided on two million digits, which takes 20 iterations. Super Pi then spits out the time (in seconds) that it took to do the calculations. Obviously, the lower the number, the better.

Super Pi
2 Million Digits
Mushkin PC3200 LII V2 @ 200 MHz
Corsair PC3200 XL Pro @ 200 MHz
Corsair PC3200 XL Pro @ 209 MHz
Corsair PC3200 XL Pro @ 254 MHz
128
128
123
103
0
(seconds)
200
 
 

And finally, Super Pi shows pretty much the same 4% improvement from the 9 MHz overclock and 24% improvement from the 54 MHz overclock.

 
<< Previous
Page 4 of 5
Next >>
Page 1: Introduction & A Closer Look
Page 2: Test Setup / Overclocking
Page 3: SiSoft Sandra 04 / PCMark04
Page 4: ScienceMark 2 / Super Pi
Page 5: Conclusion

5 User Comments
1 - Posted by Guest on August 23, 2004 - 8:33 pm

To test this you used SiSoft Sandra’s Burn-In wizard? Why not something like Memtest which actually does it properly?

Also no single stick result to see what babies can really do? And please lets up the voltage a little.

hmmmmm

2 - Posted by Guest on August 23, 2004 - 9:20 pm

"Pushing the voltage past 2.8v did not help the overclock"

3 - Posted by mrwagner on December 7, 2004 - 1:26 pm

Those are the ones that have the leds on them right? And how much better are they then the kingston hyper x?

4 - Posted by Kurtis on December 7, 2004 - 2:49 pm

do you actually read the reviews or just look at the conclusion? :P

if you look at the review you will see some pictures showing the lights on top of the memory. and we don't have any kingston hyperx to compare to, otherwise we would have had them in the benchmarking pages. :)

5 - Posted by mrwagner on December 7, 2004 - 4:12 pm

LOL my bad sorry im at work and I just kind of skimed your post I guess next time I will have to read more into it huh! 8)

Add Comment

To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.

Username: *


Password: (optional)
(Remember my login information: )

Comment: *


What is 3+2?: *