1 - Posted by
handrail
on January 4, 2005 - 8:58 am
wow, that thing seems a bit sucky. surprising from crucial.
maybe they mis-labeled a usb 1.1 drive on accident.
2 - Posted by
Guest
on January 4, 2005 - 3:06 pm
Congratulations on a good review there.
However, there is a very important mistake which I believe you should revise your review in order to correct.
The Win98/SE drivers on Crucial's website are for Gizmo1 usb drives only -- *not* the third revision which you have tested here. According to their own specifications on their website
http://www.crucial.com/store/partspecs.asp?imodule...
the USB2 Gizmo is "NOT compatible with 95/98/SE" (verbatim). Those in need of a Win98-compatible usb drive might have serious problems with your review if they purchase a Gizmo, only to find out that it does not work with Win9x operating systems.
Other than this small mistake, I liked your article. May I suggest Iomega's Micro Mini USB drives for a future review?
kind regards,
Giannis, Greece
3 - Posted by
deluver_15@hotmail.com
on April 19, 2007 - 5:25 pm
i am sick of this. all my work has been lost because this thing has malfunction. now i've got to do everything all over.
4 - Posted by
Kurtis
on April 19, 2007 - 8:50 pm
hindsight is 20/20, but...
it's always a good idea to use a USB drive just as a means of transporting data, you should always have a copy somewhere else.
Add Comment
To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.