Quantcast
BROWSE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
SanDisk Cruzer Titanium 512 MB USB Drive
 
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
Brian Kristensen
Kurtis
SanDisk
Jan. 28, 2005
Performance

Our testing of this drive consists of two parts. The first part is the speed and performance of the drive, which is quite obvious. However, because of SanDisk's claims that the Cruzer Titanium is "virtually indestructible' and can withstand up to 2,000 pounds of pressure, I decided that I should run it over with my car... for testing purposes... yes...

SiSoftware Sandra 2005

Sandra is designed to test the theoretical performance of a computer's components. The results may not be representative of real-world performance.

SiSoftware Sandra 2005
Drive Index
SanDisk Titanium
Corsair Flash Voyager
Crucial Gizmo!
16
19
6
0
MB/s (higher is better)
30
 
 

Sandra 2005 Details
SanDisk Titanium
Buffered Read: 16 MB/s
Sequential Read: 16 MB/s
Random Read: 16 MB/s
Buffered Write: 3.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 13 MB/s
Random Write: 10 MB/s
Average Access Time: 1 ms
Corsair Flash Voyager
Buffered Read: 19 MB/s
Sequential Read: 19 MB/s
Random Read: 19 MB/s
Buffered Write: 14 MB/s
Sequential Write: 5 MB/s
Random Write: 15 MB/s
Average Access Time: 20 ms
Crucial Gizmo!
Buffered Read: 6 MB/s
Sequential Read: 6 MB/s
Random Read: 6 MB/s
Buffered Write: 1.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 6 MB/s
Random Write: 3.8 MB/s
Average Access Time: 2 ms

While not an exact indication of the drive's real-world performance, the Cruzer Titanium looks like it will do very well.

Simpli Software HDTach 3

HDTach 3 has been completely rewritten for Windows 2000 and XP and will test the sequential read, random access and interface burst speeds of almost any attached storage device. While HDTach's results should be fairly close to real-world usage, it is still a benchmarking program and may not exactly represent actual performance.

Simpli Software HDTach 3
(Show All Graphs)
Burst Speed Average Read Speed
SanDisk Titanium
Corsair Flash Voyager
Crucial Gizmo!
16.6
20.3
6.6
0
MB/s (higher is better)
30
 
 
Burst Speed Average Read Speed
SanDisk Titanium
Corsair Flash Voyager
Crucial Gizmo!
16.3
18.8
6.4
0
MB/s (higher is better)
30
 
 

Simpli Software HDTach 3
Random Access Speed
SanDisk Titanium
Corsair Flash Voyager
Crucial Gizmo!
0.8
19.9
0.6
0
milliseconds (lower is better)
30
 
 

Simpli Software HDTach 3
CPU Utilization
Corsair Flash Voyager
SanDisk Titanium
Crucial Gizmo!
23
11
4
0
% (lower is better)
100
 
 

HDTach shows results very similar to Sandra. The Voyager is the leader, but the Cruzer Titanium is following right behind and performing almost three times faster than the Gizmo.

NoDeSoft DiskBench 2.4.2.2

DiskBench basically copies a file from point A to point B and records how long it took. For our tests, we had the program copy a 345 MB file from the hard drive to the USB drives and spit out the transfer speeds. Due to the nature of this program, these results should do an extremely good job of representing the actual performance of the drives.

NoDeSoft DiskBench 2.4.2.2
Copy File (345 MB)
SanDisk Titanium
Corsair Flash Voyager
Crucial Gizmo!
12.156
13.367
5.704
0
MB/s (higher is better)
30
 
 

The DiskBench shows performance extremely close to that which we would see in the 'real world.' This test simply copied a file and timed it and once again, the Titanium is doing a great job, but still can't surpass the Voyager.

Physical Testing

SanDisk claims that the Cruzer Titanium can survive up to 2,000 pounds of pressure. Here is a quote from their website:

"Cruzer Titanium is virtually indestructible, capable of surviving a force of up-to 2,000 pounds, simulating abnormal usage conditions. This specification is based on a SanDisk test environment, validated by an independent laboratory. No other claims as to its ability to withstand other destructive forces or abnormal environmental conditions, including but not limited to, extreme temperatures, corrosive ambients, X -Rays or other radiation, etc, are made by this claim."

As you are probably already aware of, we don't have a test facility for applying pressure to hardware, but that won't stop us from having our fun! In order to test the durability of the thumb drive (to an extent), I fired up my Vintage 1995 Chevy Lumina. Now this is what I call the apex of automobiles! Now, rolling over the drive with a rubber tire alone didn't seem like it would do the trick. In order to sandwich the drive between two hard surfaces, I placed a wood board on the ground and a 2x4 on top of the drive. Then I shifted into reverse, revved up the engine and listened to the thundering growl of the V6! Meet your impending doom Cruzer Titanium! Bahahaha!


Anyway, I rolled on top of the Titanium and checked to see if it was withstanding the weight of the car. Everything seemed to be intact so I rolled back off and inspected the drive for any damage. Visually, the drive seemed to be in good condition. Didn't look smashed and there was no circuitry popping out. Everything seemed well until I pushed the slider to extend the USB connector. Unfortunately, the casing compressed ever so slightly as to give the slider a little resistance. The slider was back to its original state, being a pain in the butt to move. When plugging the drive into a computer, everything worked, the LED lit up and the drive was still in good working order.


 
<< Previous
Page 3 of 4
Next >>
Page 1: Introduction
Page 2: First Looks / Features / Software
Page 3: Performance / Physical Testing
Page 4: Conclusion
Subscribe to Thumb Drives [more info]

13 User Comments
1 - Posted by kamesen on February 24, 2005 - 3:56 am

I like the crush-resistant feature, it sounds pretty handy to have. I can only think of one thing that this device is missing: a keychain attachment. DOH!!

2 - Posted by handrail on February 24, 2005 - 8:37 am

it does have a keychain attachment, it's just a pain to put on.

http://www.thetechlounge.com/image.php?img_url=htt...

3 - Posted by Kurtis on February 24, 2005 - 9:43 am

Yeah that keychain took Brian like 3 days to get on. When he finally did get it on he ended up scratching the usb drive...

"Another problem I had was the included key-ring which is required to use the lanyard or place the device on a keychain. Due to the shape of the hole on the Titanium, the drive can not simply be clipped on to any keychain. The included key-ring is small enough in both wire-diameter and overall diameter to fit the awkward hole. However, because of the hole’s extra-super-duper-awkwardness, it is almost impossible to clip the ring on. It took me a week of trying every day to actually clip the ring on and once I got it on, the ring was slightly warped. And to top it all off, it also caused the aforementioned nasty scratch."

4 - Posted by SAMSAMHA on February 24, 2005 - 12:55 pm

very nice looking. I love the retractable usb connector, I think all usb drive should come with it as you hate to loose your cap:).

5 - Posted by Kurtis on February 24, 2005 - 12:57 pm

it's a good feature but it's not implemented extremely well. it takes a while to get it 'loosened up' so that it is easy to move it in and out. also, don't run over it with a car, because that will make it harder to extend/retract it :-D

personally i like the corsair voyager more, i think water-proofing a USB drive is a brilliant feature that they should all have - and i am willing to bet that it will become a standard feature eventually

6 - Posted by Brian on February 24, 2005 - 3:06 pm

Well, the USB slider is back to normal again. Just have to wear it down after you run it over ;-)

7 - Posted by J2T on February 24, 2005 - 3:17 pm

Well, I know I got a good laugh out of the whole vehicle crush test you did. :-D

8 - Posted by mike on February 24, 2005 - 6:32 pm

I am all about the sandisc Cruzer micro. the cap nicely fits on the back of the drive. no moving parts, metal encased in plastic. But i doubt it can be used as an auto jack for my buick.

9 - Posted by kamesen on February 25, 2005 - 1:54 am

Oh sweet. Looks sturdy. But yeah, it also looks like a pain to attach. Ah well, anything is better than the keyring attachment that I have- er, USED to have. (it fell off)

10 - Posted by SlipSand on March 4, 2005 - 6:22 pm

Would you say that those are worth that much? I wanted one but I dotn want to pay that much.

11 - Posted by Guest on May 3, 2005 - 7:25 am

Thanks VERY much for such a detailed review - much appreciated as it has helped me decide to go ahead with my purchase. As far as the physical strength testing though ... forget driving a car over it ... this baby is designed to handle the daily battering it would receive in a woman's bag!!! (Being a woman I am allowed to say this!) I suggest you "road test" this gadget in a girl bag for a week, and if it still works then it has DEFINITELY passed rough handling :-)
Thanks again.

12 - Posted by Tyler on January 18, 2006 - 1:45 pm

Yes, this may look like a nice keydrive, being a nice silver color and the slide out connection. But what good does that do if the product doesnt work? Ive tried the drive in 5 different computers. One HP, a Compaq, a Dell, and two custom-built computers, none of them could even recognize the keydrive, even with the software that was downloaded.

13 - Posted by Kurtis on January 18, 2006 - 4:30 pm

maybe you just got a bad one - it happens.

Add Comment

To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.

Username: *


Password: (optional)
(Remember my login information: )

Comment: *


What is 1+2?: *


 
 
 
Recent News
Techdirt Nov. 19, 2008 - 3:38 pm
Ars Technica Nov. 19, 2008 - 3:05 pm
HardOCP Nov. 17, 2008 - 11:58 pm
Gizmodo Nov. 17, 2008 - 11:55 pm
[H] Enthusiast Nov. 16, 2008 - 5:12 pm
Nov. 13, 2008 - 7:31 pm
Kotaku Nov. 13, 2008 - 7:23 pm