Compact Flash CF Card Round-Up
|
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
|
Kurtis Kronk
Brian
Dec. 28, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real-World Read Performance
In addition to the recording tests I also ran some transfer tests. These tests involve taking a set of Superfine JPEGs taken by the 20D (484 MB) and first transferring it to each of the CF cards. Once all of the CF cards have exactly the same images on them, I will transfer the files to my computer. The card readers I am testing include a SanDisk External USB CF Card Reader, SimpleTech Flashlink External 23-in-1 USB Card Reader, Mitsumi Internal 5-in-1 Card Reader, and Sandisk's PCMCIA (Notebook) CF Card Reader. The notebook used for transferring via PCMCIA is a Hewlett Packard Pavillion zv5000 which uses a Texas Instruments PCI-1620 CardBus Controller with UltraMedia. I will also be transferring the pictures directly from the camera to the computer to see what sort of benefit can be had by using a card reader. Again, I used a stopwatch to record times and took an average across 3 results. Time started when I dragged the files onto the desktop and let go of the mouse button and stopped when the file transfer was completed.
Read Tests (USB)
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
 |
SanDisk External |
  |
SimpleTech |
  |
Mitsumi |
 |
SanDisk Ultra II 1GB
Lexar Professional 80x 1GB
ATP High Speed 60x 1GB
Kingston Elite Pro 50x 1GB
SimpleTech 1GB
PNY 512MB
Lexar Professional 40x 2GB
Crucial 1GB
0
seconds (lower is better)
120
 |
SanDisk External |
  |
SimpleTech |
  |
Mitsumi |
 |
SanDisk Ultra II 1GB
Lexar Professional 80x 1GB
ATP High Speed 60x 1GB
Kingston Elite Pro 50x 1GB
SimpleTech 1GB
PNY 512MB
Lexar Professional 40x 2GB
Crucial 1GB
0
seconds (lower is better)
120
 |
SanDisk External |
  |
SimpleTech |
  |
Mitsumi |
 |
SanDisk Ultra II 1GB
ATP High Speed 60x 1GB
Lexar Professional 80x 1GB
Kingston Elite Pro 50x 1GB
SimpleTech 1GB
Lexar Professional 40x 2GB
PNY 512MB
Crucial 1GB
0
seconds (lower is better)
120
In the USB-based transfer tests we see a clear order in terms of performance numbers. With the Mitsumi internal reader, a couple of the cards flip-flop positions, but they do so with similarly performing cards. Based on the speed ratings of each of the cards, there are no real surprises here.
Read Tests (PCMCIA / Directly From Camera)
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
Crucial 1GB
SanDisk Ultra II 1GB
Kingston Elite Pro 50x 1GB
SimpleTech 1GB
ATP High Speed 60x 1GB
PNY 512MB
Lexar Professional 80x 1GB
Lexar Professional 40x 2GB
0
seconds (lower is better)
1200
Kingston Elite Pro 50x 1GB
SanDisk Ultra II 1GB
ATP High Speed 60x 1GB
Crucial 1GB
SimpleTech 1GB
PNY 512MB
Lexar Professional 40x 2GB
Lexar Professional 80x 1GB
0
seconds (lower is better)
1200
SanDisk Ultra II 1GB
Kingston Elite Pro 50x 1GB
SimpleTech 1GB
PNY 512MB
Lexar Professional 80x 1GB
ATP High Speed 60x 1GB
Crucial 1GB
Lexar Professional 40x 2GB
0
seconds (lower is better)
1200
In this set of graphs the playing field becomes a bit more even. While the greatest difference between top and bottom-performers is 30 seconds, that's just 30 seconds more than 14 minutes and 12 seconds - after that long you've probably already fallen asleep anyways. What I find particularly interesting in these numbers is that transferring directly from the 20D to the notebook (via USB 2.0) actually took less time than transferring via the PCMCIA adapter, about two minutes less. The A95, however, took more than 8 minutes longer to transfer files than the PCMCIA adapter, due to the camera's slow USB 1.1 interface.
1 - Posted by
blackjet
on January 3, 2006 - 2:47 am
Hay Kurtis,
Great article, never really thought about the speed of CF, something worth considering when i finally get round to buying myself a digital camera rather than borrowing my dad's all the time! :-)
Add Comment
To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.
|
CNN Mar. 12, 2010 - 9:51 pm
MCV Mar. 5, 2010 - 11:59 pm
|