1 - Posted by
Nick
on May 25, 2006 - 12:47 pm
If I give that thing 1000volts will a portal open up and suck my nano into another dimension?
Does it make a comfy hat? Would you wear it with the display in front or in back if it did?
2 - Posted by
Kalo
on May 25, 2006 - 5:36 pm
Nice all-in-one, but bad name. :P
3 - Posted by
Kurtis
on May 25, 2006 - 6:36 pm
It's actually just called the JBL On Time; Time Machine Dock for iPod is like the catch phrase for the product - but yeah it's not a great catch phrase :-P
4 - Posted by
Mark
on May 26, 2006 - 3:38 pm
The only way it would be a fitting catch phrase is if it could actually perform time travel. If it could do that, they might actually be able to justify that ridiculous price too. :-p
5 - Posted by
fr00zen
on May 27, 2006 - 5:31 pm
I think the name is a bit silly. If anything, the name is a "turn off". I would not buy an item with that name. It just sounds stupid.
6 - Posted by
Kurtis
on May 27, 2006 - 9:31 pm
and someone once laughed at the idea of a "mouse" for a human interface device for computers :-P
I'm not defending the product in question, but to judge a product by its name is silly.
7 - Posted by
Brian
on May 27, 2006 - 10:40 pm
Yeah... just look at the Playstation...
8 - Posted by
tiamat
on May 28, 2006 - 5:22 pm
Nintendo named it's new machine Wiii, and people are still buying it.
I would not judge a product by the name. It would be like judging a book because of it's cover.
9 - Posted by
kerma
on May 31, 2006 - 11:53 am
A weird name can draw attention to a product. I think that is what Nintendo is doing.
10 - Posted by
mheade
on June 3, 2006 - 4:29 pm
You know, for about 1/2 the price, you can get an iHome which has near all the same functionality. With a name like JBL, I'd expect the extra $$$ to go towards the sound.
11 - Posted by
Kurtis
on June 3, 2006 - 5:05 pm
lol... funny you mention that. we got one for review. keep your eyes out for it :)
12 - Posted by
DirtCrashr
on September 26, 2007 - 10:16 am
We got this, we hate it. The iPod is continuously going on the fritz and the clock-display goes to bit-salad and everything has to be re-set. Since it does it even without the iPod I'm not sure what the problem is - something in firmware - it's unreliable as an alarm-clock and doesn't catch the automatic time-set.
But mainly you can't set the alarm volume at a level of your own choice. It comes on loud and gets louder and louder as the alarm proceeds until it's too damn loud, whether it's the radio/iPod/beeper. It's loud enough to wake the neighbors through three layers of insulation and sheetrock. There should be a cutoff volume.
This is meant for a 17-yr old slumber hog who could sleep through a nuclear blast, not an adult with neighbors.
13 - Posted by
harvester
on December 15, 2009 - 7:33 am
Does anyone know if you can use the 5th gen. ipod nano with the jbl on time? I would like to get my daughter the nano for Christmas.
TIA, harvester
14 - Posted by
scoopfest
on January 15, 2010 - 4:21 pm
15 - Posted by
nickw
on January 15, 2010 - 4:22 pm
16 - Posted by
Max Slowik
on January 15, 2010 - 9:29 pm
It's actually pretty hard to find this 2-year-old gadget. JBL has a newer On Time with a different aesthetic for $180 on Amazon.com.
Add Comment
To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.