1 - Posted by
jdtart
on June 15, 2006 - 12:41 pm
Why would I buy a 17in at $200+ when I could get the 2007FPW 20.1 inch WIDE screen for ~$350??
2 - Posted by
Kurtis
on June 15, 2006 - 12:50 pm
Because $350 is almost twice as much as $200 perhaps? we recommended it to people on a budget... as in people who don't have more than $200 to spend. :-P
that said, i personally agree with you - i would buy the 20.1" over the 17" any day of the week (and I think Anthony would agree as well). but like i said, some people have a budget, and for them this is a great monitor.
I don't know why you would buy it... it doesn't really matter. As for other consumers...
Not everyone wants or needs a 20" monitor. 17" is plenty of space for the average Joe and $200 is a much better price for those who are on a budget.
4 - Posted by
Rich
on June 15, 2006 - 1:27 pm
I have always been partial to the 1905 FP's myself.
5 - Posted by
Anthony
on June 16, 2006 - 12:10 pm
Indeed. Its good for those who really cant or dont care to spend more than $200 on a monitor (my parents, for example).
For myself, a power user, I'd definately stay with monitors 19"+.
6 - Posted by
Nick
on June 16, 2006 - 4:48 pm
Also a good second monitor for dual monitor or another machine.
7 - Posted by
latitude
on July 6, 2006 - 11:39 pm
can a latitude x1 with a VGA connection support the ultrasharp 2007 fpw 20.1 inch monitor? Please let me know.
8 - Posted by
CTM420
on July 7, 2006 - 11:57 pm
You hit the nail on the head. :-)
Add Comment
To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.