iPod FM Tuners / Transmitters
|
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
|
Mark Korff
Kurtis
DLO & Kensington
Sep. 4, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
It's difficult to identify a clear winner between these two products because they are pretty similar performance-wise in almost every way. The nanoTune is priced at $70, and the Kensington at $80, so they're priced similarly as well. If you're looking for a FM tuner/transmitter but you don't have a nano, or possibly want to use the same product with different kinds of iPods, the Kensington is your only option here because of the nanoTune's design constraints.
In terms of tuning quality, I'm not comfortable in deciding a clear winner. If you normally have very strong radio signals in your area the Kensington might be slightly better for you, while if you're in the opposite situation with signals not quite as strong, the nanoTune could give slightly better reception across the board.
The radio transmission quality test was almost a total sweep by the Kensington before I discovered the headphone trick. If you'd rather not have to connect your earbuds every time you could get by with the Kensington and still get fairly good reception, while the nanoTune wouldn't even be able to compete. However, I'd give a slight nod to the transmission quality of the nanoTune when the headphones are connected.
As far as additional features are concerned, the Kensington has the added benefit of offering the four preset buttons which can be used for both transmission and tuning presets. The nanoTune on the other hand will require you to manually tune to every station every time. If you have an iPod nano however, the nanoTune acts as a decent protective case and has the ability to go into "desktop mode" as well. These are the biggest differences between the two products and since we don't have a clear winner in the other categories, I'd suggest making a purchase decision based on which of these features is more important to you.
Kensington Duo FM Radio & Transmitter
Pros
Good sound quality when receiving a strong signal
Can transmit with decent quality even without headphones attached
Presets for both transmission and reception
Can be used with different versions of iPods
Cons
Doesn't provide protection for iPod
Screen is hard to read at angles
DLO nanoTune
Pros
Relatively good sound quality even with weaker signals
Excellent transmission when headphones are connected
Good protection and versatility for iPod nano
Cons
Terrible transmission without headphones
No presets
Can only be used with iPod nano
Screen is hard to read at angles
Page 1: Introduction
Page 2: First Impressions
Page 3: Testing
Page 4: Conclusion
Add Comment
To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.
|
1up Sep. 4, 2008 - 10:31 am
I4U Aug. 24, 2008 - 2:46 am
|