Quantcast
BROWSE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
Foxconn 7950 GT OC 512MB PCI-E
 
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
Kurtis Kronk
Brian
FOXCONN
Feb. 4, 2007
Testing - NFSMW



Need for Speed Most Wanted is the newest in a long series of NFS titles. This game is extremely taxing even on some of the highest-end hardware available today if you crank up the video settings. And of course, we do crank up the settings for benchmarking. Unfortunately this game does not support a demo recording feature that I am aware of and there is no built-in benchmarking utility. As such, I am forced to use FRAPS and run the same course multiple times for the various settings.

For benchmarking I go to Quick Race > Custom Race > Circuit > Ironwood Estates > 2 laps, and I use the same car each time (a pimped out RX-8 if you're curious, but not too pimped out because I don't have the time to play and earn more upgrades). Each test is repeated 3 times, however, the weather changes every race (and during the race), so while the benchmark results are pretty reliable, they're not exactly scientific. To help keep the tests as consistent as possible, I run the same course every race, and I never use the nitrous (because it queues special effects which I can't reproduce precisely every race).

All of the in-game video settings are maxed out and the only variables are AA, AF, and resolution. Since the AA and AF sliders represent different values on ATI and NVIDIA cards I just test AA and AF at their minimum and maximum respective settings at each resolution. Otherwise the comparisons lose their value. I should note that it appears from gameplay and screenshots I've taken that the minimum texture quality (AF) setting represents bilinear filtering. I would think they would at least make it trilinear since it's noticeably better quality and what I consider the standard 'minimum' AF setting - but that's neither NVIDIA nor ATI's fault. Silly EA. Patch 1.3 was used.

Need for Speed Most Wanted @ 1024 x 768
(Show All Graphs)
No AA / No AF Full AA / Full AF
ATI X1950 Pro 256MB (Crossfire)
ATI X1650 XT 256MB (Crossfire)
Foxconn 7950 GT OC 512MB
XFX 7900 GS 256MB
ATI X1950 Pro 256MB
Leadtek 7950 GT 256MB
ATI X1900 XT 256MB
ATI X1650 XT 256MB
57
56
55
55
54
54
53
48
0
FPS
100
 
 
No AA / No AF Full AA / Full AF
Foxconn 7950 GT OC 512MB
ATI X1950 Pro 256MB (Crossfire)
Leadtek 7950 GT 256MB
ATI X1900 XT 256MB
ATI X1650 XT 256MB (Crossfire)
ATI X1950 Pro 256MB
XFX 7900 GS 256MB
ATI X1650 XT 256MB
56
56
54
53
50
49
49
36
0
FPS
100
 
 

Need for Speed Most Wanted @ 1280 x 960
(Show All Graphs)
No AA / No AF Full AA / Full AF
ATI X1950 Pro 256MB (Crossfire)
Foxconn 7950 GT OC 512MB
ATI X1900 XT 256MB
Leadtek 7950 GT 256MB
ATI X1650 XT 256MB (Crossfire)
ATI X1950 Pro 256MB
XFX 7900 GS 256MB
ATI X1650 XT 256MB
55
53
52
50
49
49
46
26
0
FPS
100
 
 
No AA / No AF Full AA / Full AF
ATI X1950 Pro 256MB (Crossfire)
Foxconn 7950 GT OC 512MB
ATI X1900 XT 256MB
ATI X1650 XT 256MB (Crossfire)
Leadtek 7950 GT 256MB
ATI X1950 Pro 256MB
XFX 7900 GS 256MB
ATI X1650 XT 256MB
55
50
47
45
44
41
37
19
0
FPS
100
 
 

Need for Speed Most Wanted @ 1600 x 1200
(Show All Graphs)
No AA / No AF Full AA / Full AF
ATI X1950 Pro 256MB (Crossfire)
Foxconn 7950 GT OC 512MB
ATI X1900 XT 256MB
ATI X1950 Pro 256MB
XFX 7900 GS 256MB
Leadtek 7950 GT 256MB
ATI X1650 XT 256MB (Crossfire)
ATI X1650 XT 256MB
53
47
46
39
37
37
36
0
0
FPS
100
 
 
No AA / No AF Full AA / Full AF
ATI X1950 Pro 256MB (Crossfire)
Foxconn 7950 GT OC 512MB
ATI X1900 XT 256MB
Leadtek 7950 GT 256MB
ATI X1950 Pro 256MB
XFX 7900 GS 256MB
ATI X1650 XT 256MB
ATI X1650 XT 256MB (Crossfire)
50
38
37
34
30
28
0
0
0
FPS
100
 
 

 
<< Previous
Page 6 of 10
Next >>
Page 1: Introduction, The Card / Bundle
Page 2: Test Setup
Page 3: Testing - Half-Life 2 Episode 1
Page 4: Testing - Chronicles of Riddick: Escape From Butcher's Bay
Page 5: Testing - F.E.A.R.
Page 6: Testing - Need for Speed Most Wanted
Page 7: Testing - X3 Reunion Demo
Page 8: Testing - 3DMark 06
Page 9: Performance Summary
Page 10: Conclusion

1 User Comment
1 - Posted by daytroxative on February 13, 2007 - 2:09 am

The packaging i've seen for them is funny looking for this card. Overall, foxconn cards in retail are some of the cheapest, pretty well manufactured cards you can get. Or maybe it's just the suppliers around here. But we get these and the 8800's cheap.

Add Comment

To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.

Username: *


Password: (optional)
(Remember my login information: )

Comment: *


What is 2+2?: *