|
The "New" DRM
The New DRM - Page 1
"Conscience. What a thing. If you believe you got a conscience it'll pester you to death. But if you don't believe you got one, what could it do t'ya? Makes me sick, all this talking and fussing about nonsense." -- Dobbs (Humphrey Bogart) - The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948) Sometimes when folks are trying to run you out of town on a rail the best thing you can do is start leading the parade. The guy from Cupertino (hint: that's Steve) made a bold move in that direction with his Manifesto posted on the Apple web site. He turned to the crowd and said... "Wait a minute folks my lowly little anywhere music player/music site isn't the problem. The devils in your own back yard made me do it." He's right... and he's wrong. The entertainment industry is right... and they're wrong. The entertainment consumer is right... and he/she is wrong. It all boils down to DRM (digital rights management) and CA (conditional access) of content. By deftly deflecting the issue from Apple's phenomenal iPod/iTunes success to the requirements the music industry laid down that enabled the company to garner more than 60% of the mobile music player market his posting may force the industry to finally work together for the... consumer. Once content became digital it became tradable - easily swappable across the internet. People have learned to suppress their conscience regarding the content they grab, enjoy, pass around willingly. Jobs notes that his DRM only protects the content on iPods that are legally purchased from iTunes. According to his figures that's less than 3% and the rest comes from... anywhere/everywhere, legal/illegal. Truth is online music purchasing has increased. According to the Online Publishes Association (OPA) online paid sales were $1.3 billion in '02 and $2 billion in '05. While these sales were generated by RealNetworks, AOL, YouTube, LimeWire, Yahoo and others; iTunes was the runaway leader in download music sales. According to the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) download sales are still only a fraction of physical content sales. That would be okay but those sales are falling. Since it was introduced, iTunes has enjoyed 1 billion song sales. That's only logical. You bought into Steve's vision of the super cool, super hip white earbuds/cords. Of course you're going to buy into his super smooth way of getting the music! Who knew there were strings attached? Oh yeah a few disgruntled folks in Europe and those pesky folks who file class action suits. Wanna use someone else's player? Go somewhere else to buy your music. Wanna throw someone else's music on your iPod? Have at it. Folks are... According to BigChampagne (an Internet measurement firm) more than 15 billion songs were "illegally" downloaded last year. Maybe that's why the music industry's physical (unprotected) content sales are in... the toilet. Disc sales declined another 4.9% according to Neilsen SoundScan. But online song swapping was up. This is probably the only time you can't blame the kids for the sales decline. Sales were actually up for the teens and tweens. More than we can say for the other entertainment enjoyment age categories. So obviously we all know the problem. Its Steve's closed environment!
Related Articles Editorials August 27, 2009
Editorials August 18, 2009
Editorials March 3, 2009
Editorials February 12, 2009
Add Comment
5 User Comments 1 - Posted by
handrail
on February 19, 2007 - 9:08 am well if the stupid music industry would just lower the cost of buying a CD to something reasonable AND allow you to rip the music to MP3, they would most likely take a bite back out of the Apple. if CDs were only $5 instead of $10 or $15 and users could easily rip them to MP3, think of what that would do to sales. i'd certainly buy more CDs...if i cared about the crap pop music that is driving the whole issue in the first place. i typically buy indy music on CD or MP3 from emusic.com so i've never had an DRM issue because the RIAA never enters into the picture. $0.99/song is such a rip off for iTunes or on CD format. there is no reason why it should still cost $10+ per album. i could see if iTunes offered a special for something like $7.99 an album or $0.99/song...at least cut us a better deal for buying the whole album. but no, the industry wants their last little bit of cash to bleed the consumer dry. but then they complain when people take advantage of technology to seek free music. personally i love what the digital music revolution has done for independent music. it has made it easier for small labels to push out new material with less cost. i hope the larger companies loose even more money, they deserve to. DRM is just one more way for large music labels to waste money on ridiculous measures to protect their already overly priced product. and that wasted money ends up getting tacked onto the cost of the CD you purchase at best buy. buy more vinyl. 2 - Posted by
Max Slowik
on February 19, 2007 - 5:41 pm "well if the stupid music industry would just lower the cost of buying a CD to something reasonable AND allow you to rip the music to MP3, they would most likely take a bite back out of the Apple." Ah, but CDs don't use any encryption for content protection, and as such, it is perfectly legal to rip your CDs into .mp3s. One the remaining ways "fair use" seems to still count. What would be really great would be if there was a directory on the audio CD with all the tracks already ripped to a high-bitrate .mp3/ ogg/ something-else-non-DRMed-to-Hell right there, with the album art, lyrics. . .the works. Then iTunes would drop a dozen pegs immediately. (Not that I'm saying that's a great thing, but it would do good things for the record labels.) The best thing is that they could watermark the music, and then have a specific file to search for in piracy lanes. Best of both worlds. 3 - Posted by
Kurtis
on February 19, 2007 - 5:47 pm Digg this article here: http://digg.com/security/The_New_DRM 4 - Posted by
handrail
on February 19, 2007 - 11:22 pm i was referring to the various copy-protections attempts that companies have tried using on CDs.
5 - Posted by
Rich
on February 20, 2007 - 8:02 am The name Sony seems to come up....
Add Comment To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields. |
Recent Reviews Video Cards September 23, 2009
Gaming Devices July 17, 2009
Portable Media Players July 16, 2009
Thumb Drives July 14, 2009
Recent News VICE Nov. 20, 2009 - 7:17 pm
Wired Nov. 20, 2009 - 7:07 pm
Engadget Nov. 20, 2009 - 6:58 pm
Telegraph.co.uk Nov. 20, 2009 - 6:48 pm
BBC Nov. 20, 2009 - 6:38 pm
Destructoid Nov. 18, 2009 - 11:55 pm
Wired Nov. 16, 2009 - 11:56 pm
Ultimate Typing Championship Nov. 16, 2009 - 11:42 pm
|
|||||||||||||||
