Onboard Video Acceleration: ATi Vs. Intel Vs. nVidia
|
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
|
Max Slowik
Kurtis
N/A
Apr. 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction
Video cards aren't just for playing games. Graphics acceleration is great for fragging, but for watching videos you need good video acceleration.
Such is the case with the increasingly popular Home Theater PC (HTPC). How stymied would you be if you spent over $1,000 on a computer to find that your previous $40 DVD player did a better job playing movies?
Dedicated video cards can be expensive while also introducing power and heat concerns, so having onboard hardware video acceleration is very appealing to the HTPC crowd. Just like set-top boxes, HTPCs are usually on 24/7, so any saved kilowatt hours are always welcome. The real improvement, though, is having less heat and therefore less noise-producing fans to manage that heat.
In the world of laptops, onboard video is often the only video option, so a chipset without good video playback might be a deal-breaker. While I'm looking at desktop motherboards here, the chipsets are common to both desktops and laptops so my findings will really be applicable across the board.
This review will compare the video playback performance of AMD's 690V, NVIDIA's MCP61, and Intel's G965 chipsets using CyberLink's StarCinema DVD player and codec. To rate the video as objectively as possible, I'll be using the HQV benchmark DVD, a collection of clips that highlight the many processes that video playback involves, and then rating them based on my findings.
Page 1: Introduction to Video Acceleration
Page 2: Methodology & Benchmark Results
Page 3: Conclusion
|
Guru3D Jun. 25, 2008 - 5:38 pm
|