1 - Posted by
aireiq
on June 26, 2007 - 7:14 pm
"Ed: Sort of."
What/why? I am not a computer hardware enthusiast, so I guess I would like a little explanation of the remark. Do you mean that higher clock speed capability isn't a good thing?
Which card would the editor choose and why?
Thanks.
2 - Posted by
Kurtis
on June 26, 2007 - 10:42 pm
Here's the comment in its full context for reference:
"Taking a look from a few steps back, on the other hand, this card is capable of clocks higher than an 8800 Ultra, and that's something to be proud of. (Ed: Sort of.)"
Basically, the 8800 Ultra is a joke of a card, so I was poking fun at it.
3 - Posted by
aireiq
on June 27, 2007 - 6:25 pm
@Kurtis
Thanks for the clarification. I didn't know that the 8800 Ultra was crap.
Thanks again for explaining.
4 - Posted by
Kurtis
on June 27, 2007 - 8:48 pm
The problem with the 8800 Ultra is that the price / performance ratio is just a little absurd. There is no competitor to the Ultra right now from AMD/ATI but I don't think AMD/ATI is losing any sleep over that fact. :)
Add Comment
To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.