Quantcast
BROWSE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
 
PNY 8800GTX 768MB XLR8 Overclocked Edition
 
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
Max Slowik
Kurtis
PNY
Jun. 22, 2007
Testing - Company of Heroes



This amazing WWII real-time strategy game is also very demanding, and will use all the horsepower you can throw at it. We're using the in-game benchmarking utility, with the graphics set to maximum for the first series of benchmarks, and then again with anti-aliasing. For both series of tests, physics is disabled as it seems to introduce a lot of variability in the benchmark results. Patch 1.61 was used.

Between patches and driver revisions, on both ATI and NVIDIA hardware, CoH sometimes displays frame-rate throttling at 60FPS. Until we can find a way to disable the cap, we'll let you know when hardware is running at its limits or if it's just being throttled on the Performance Summary page.

Company of Heroes @ 1280 x 1024
(Show All Graphs)
NoAA Full
PNY 8800GTX XLR8 768MB
ASUS 8800GTX 768MB
ATI HD 2900XT 512MB
Foxconn 8800GTS 320MB
Leadtek 8800GTS 640MB
Albatron 8600GT 256MB
141
132
124
61
59
32
0
FPS
175
 
 
NoAA Full
PNY 8800GTX XLR8 768MB
ASUS 8800GTX 768MB
ATI HD 2900XT 512MB
Leadtek 8800GTS 640MB
Foxconn 8800GTS 320MB
Albatron 8600GT 256MB
139
131
121
59
58
33
0
FPS
175
 
 

Company of Heroes @ 1600 x 1200
(Show All Graphs)
NoAA Full
PNY 8800GTX XLR8 768MB
ASUS 8800GTX 768MB
ATI HD 2900XT 512MB
Foxconn 8800GTS 320MB
Leadtek 8800GTS 640MB
Albatron 8600GT 256MB
117
104
98
69
57
25
0
FPS
175
 
 
NoAA Full
PNY 8800GTX XLR8 768MB
ASUS 8800GTX 768MB
ATI HD 2900XT 512MB
Leadtek 8800GTS 640MB
Foxconn 8800GTS 320MB
Albatron 8600GT 256MB
117
104
89
57
44
24
0
FPS
175
 
 

Company of Heroes @ 1920 x 1600
(Show All Graphs)
NoAA Full
PNY 8800GTX XLR8 768MB
ASUS 8800GTX 768MB
ATI HD 2900XT 512MB
Foxconn 8800GTS 320MB
Leadtek 8800GTS 640MB
Albatron 8600GT 256MB
106
90
58
53
53
19
0
FPS
175
 
 
NoAA Full
PNY 8800GTX XLR8 768MB
ASUS 8800GTX 768MB
ATI HD 2900XT 512MB
Leadtek 8800GTS 640MB
Foxconn 8800GTS 320MB
Albatron 8600GT 256MB
106
89
58
53
33
18
0
FPS
175
 
 

 
<< Previous
Page 6 of 10
Next >>
Page 1: Introduction
Page 2: The Card & Bundle
Page 3: Test Setup
Page 4: Testing - HL2 Episode 1
Page 5: Testing - F.E.A.R.
Page 6: Testing - Company of Heroes
Page 7: Testing - Prey
Page 8: Testing - Need for Speed Most Wanted
Page 9: Testing - 3DMark 06
Page 10: Performance Summary, Overclocking & Conclusion

4 User Comments
1 - Posted by aireiq on June 26, 2007 - 7:14 pm

"Ed: Sort of."

What/why? I am not a computer hardware enthusiast, so I guess I would like a little explanation of the remark. Do you mean that higher clock speed capability isn't a good thing?

Which card would the editor choose and why?

Thanks.

2 - Posted by Kurtis on June 26, 2007 - 10:42 pm

Here's the comment in its full context for reference:

"Taking a look from a few steps back, on the other hand, this card is capable of clocks higher than an 8800 Ultra, and that's something to be proud of. (Ed: Sort of.)"

Basically, the 8800 Ultra is a joke of a card, so I was poking fun at it.

3 - Posted by aireiq on June 27, 2007 - 6:25 pm

@Kurtis

Thanks for the clarification. I didn't know that the 8800 Ultra was crap.

Thanks again for explaining.

4 - Posted by Kurtis on June 27, 2007 - 8:48 pm

The problem with the 8800 Ultra is that the price / performance ratio is just a little absurd. There is no competitor to the Ultra right now from AMD/ATI but I don't think AMD/ATI is losing any sleep over that fact. :)

Add Comment

To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.

Username: *


Password: (optional)
(Remember my login information: )

Comment: *


What is 6+2?: *