|
Leadtek 8800GTS 640MB
Testing - Company of Heroes
 This amazing WWII real-time strategy game is also very demanding, and will use all the horsepower you can throw at it. We're using the in-game benchmarking utility, with the graphics set to maximum for the first series of benchmarks, and then again with anti-aliasing. For both series of tests, physics is disabled as it seems to introduce a lot of variability in the benchmark results. Patch 1.61 was used. Between patches and driver revisions, on both ATI and NVIDIA hardware, CoH sometimes displays frame-rate throttling at 60FPS. Until we can find a way to disable the cap, we'll let you know when hardware is running at its limits or if it's just being throttled on the Performance Summary page.
Company of Heroes @ 1280 x 1024
(Show All Graphs)
141
132
124
61
59
45
32
0
FPS
175
139
131
121
59
58
43
33
0
FPS
175
Company of Heroes @ 1600 x 1200
(Show All Graphs)
117
104
98
69
57
32
25
0
FPS
175
117
104
89
57
44
31
24
0
FPS
175
Company of Heroes @ 1920 x 1600
(Show All Graphs)
106
90
58
53
53
26
19
0
FPS
175
106
89
58
53
33
25
18
0
FPS
175
Page 1: Introduction
Page 2: The Card & Bundle Page 3: Test Setup Page 4: Testing - HL2 Episode 1 Page 5: Testing - F.E.A.R. Page 6: Testing - Company of Heroes Page 7: Testing - Prey Page 8: Testing - Need for Speed Most Wanted Page 9: Testing - 3DMark 06 & HQV Page 10: Performance Summary, Overclocking & Conclusion 
Related Reviews Video Cards September 23, 2009
Video Cards June 25, 2009
Video Cards June 8, 2009
Video Cards April 6, 2009
Add Comment
5 User Comments 1 - Posted by
handrail
on August 16, 2007 - 4:45 pm looks like the hood off a 70s trans-am.
2 - Posted by
Rich
on August 17, 2007 - 5:03 pm Show me the FLAMING CHICKEN!!!!
3 - Posted by
PrinceGaz
on August 17, 2007 - 9:33 pm I just received an identical card today (a Leadtek 8800GTS with the blue heatsink cover). I've put it through its paces and am absolutely staggered by how high it overclocks. Yours was good, but mine is staggering. Using the latest 162.18 drivers, it is rock solid with nTune used to raise the settings from the default 513/792 (near as dammit to the 500/800 stock speeds the card is advertised as having). Now I'd expect to be able to raise the core by quite a bit, and indeed I did, but memory is always limited by the speed of the chips used on the card, and whether you are lucky (and with ten memory chips on an 8800GTS, you can't hope for too much). I was amazed. The core passed 550 easily. 600 as well. At that point I decided to let ATITool do my overclocking and I'd hit Abort as soon as I saw a problem. 600 passed without a problem again, as did 650. It was only somewhere soon after 670 that some corruption appeared, though it was minor and was able to stop ATITool immediately. I then reset the core to default and decided to see what the memory could do. From the default of around 800, it passed 850, 900, 950 (at this point I was worried it wasn't testing it properly as this seemed a very high memory overclock), 1000, soon after which I paniced and hit the Abort as I feared damaging my card. As it turned out after running other tests, 1000 was pretty much the stable maximum for the card. After determining safe speeds (650 core, 1000 memory) I've ran intensive tests and it is rock solid on my system (X2 4400+ @ 2.5GHz), with the following 3DMark06 results default- 8330 (3894 sm2.0, 3751 HDR/sm3.0, 1929 cpu) @ 513/792d (162.18 driver) default- 8953 (4223 sm2.0, 4207 HDR/sm3.0, 1933 cpu) @ 650/792d (162.18 driver) default- 8540 (3965 sm2.0, 3941 HDR/sm3.0, 1930 cpu) @ 513/1000d (162.18 driver) default- 9092 (4257 sm2.0, 4355 HDR/sm3.0, 1933 cpu) @ 650/1000d (162.18 driver) 1600x1200 4xAA(0), Aniso(16)- 5548 (2494 sm2.0, 2064 HDR/sm3.0, 1932 cpu) @ 513/792d (162.18 driver) 1600x1200 4xAA(0), Aniso(16)- 6224 (2912 sm2.0, 2339 HDR/sm3.0, 1926 cpu) @ 650/792d (162.18 driver) 1600x1200 4xAA(0), Aniso(16)- 5869 (2623 sm2.0, 2260 HDR/sm3.0, 1929 cpu) @ 513/1000d (162.18 driver) 1600x1200 4xAA(0), Aniso(16)- 6715 (3156 sm2.0, 2613 HDR/sm3.0, 1931 cpu) @ 650/1000d (162.18 driver) The 650/1000 doesn't make it an 8800GTX because of the fewer enabled shaders and memory-bus width, but the 650MHz is pretty staggering imo as it is above the stock speed of even an 8800 Ultra (612MHz). I think I've probably been lucky to receive an 8800GTS which clocks as high both in core and memory as it does, but even if it didn't, I would agree with your review that the Leadteks are damn good cards as they are amongst the cheapest. It pretty much answered my suspicions about factory overclocked cards. That they won't be able to overclock any higher than a random sample from a company which doesn't cherry-pick cores for higher-priced overclocked models. 4 - Posted by
Kurtis
on August 18, 2007 - 2:58 pm Nice overclock... Have you tried running a few real games to verify that there are no artifacts? I noticed back when I did the video card reviews that often times you wouldn't see artifacts necessarily in 3DMark but you would in real games. If you have... congrats on a great buy! :-D 5 - Posted by
D.K.
on September 1, 2007 - 4:35 pm I'm looking to purchase a video card, and thanks to the reviews you guys have submitted I have made my decision to buy this card. Thanks heaps!!
Add Comment To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields. |
Recent Articles Editorials August 27, 2009
Editorials August 18, 2009
Editorials March 3, 2009
Editorials February 12, 2009
Recent News VICE Nov. 20, 2009 - 7:17 pm
Wired Nov. 20, 2009 - 7:07 pm
Engadget Nov. 20, 2009 - 6:58 pm
Telegraph.co.uk Nov. 20, 2009 - 6:48 pm
BBC Nov. 20, 2009 - 6:38 pm
Destructoid Nov. 18, 2009 - 11:55 pm
Wired Nov. 16, 2009 - 11:56 pm
Ultimate Typing Championship Nov. 16, 2009 - 11:42 pm
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
