Palit Radeon HD 4870 512MB Video Card
|
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
|
Max Slowik
Kurtis
Palit
Jul. 23, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video Quality, Power Usage & Noise, and Overclocking

HQV
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
Sapphire HD 3870 X2
PowerColor HD 4850
Zotac GTX 280
Palit HD 4870
PNY 9800 GTX
0
Score (out of 130, higher is better)
160
Sapphire HD 3870 X2
PNY 9800 GTX
Zotac GTX 280
Palit HD 4870
PowerColor HD 4850
0
Score (out of 130, higher is better)
160
Identical to a 4850 in this regard, a 4870 excels with video. That shouldn't be a problem for a flagship card, but there you have it. The previous subjective shortcomings of ATI's video processing, namely delays with moire compensation, are now gone.

Power Usage
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
 |
Card (Idle) |
  |
Card (Full Load) |
 |
PowerColor HD 4850
Zotac GTX 280
Sapphire HD 3870 X2
PNY 9800 GTX
Palit HD 4870
0
Watts (lower is better)
250
 |
Card (Idle) |
  |
Card (Full Load) |
 |
PowerColor HD 4850
PNY 9800 GTX
Palit HD 4870
Sapphire HD 3870 X2
Zotac GTX 280
0
Watts (lower is better)
250
The 4870 breaks the mold here, for ATI. It uses a lot of power, 75W at idle. It's nothing compared to the 200-series NVIDIA cards, which is a feather in ATI's cap. The heatsink does an great job of cooling the card, and it runs cooler than a 4850--about five degrees cooler, in the 80 degree C area. It does this at a cost of peace and quiet. The fan would be a lot less aggravating if it ran at a constant speed; the thermal sensor varies the fan a lot and frequently, making its profile higher than if it just blew constantly. It's nowhere near as loud as a 200-series card, but it's still worse than a 3870.

Overclocking
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
The fan that cools, though, is the fan that overclocks. Unfortunately low, I hit the Catalyst Control Center's overclocking ceiling of 790 core/ 1100 memory. That's fine for the memory, stock clocked at 900MHz--a 22% overclock! This pays off particularly well since the memory is this card's real bottleneck. But the core only got a 40MHz increase, up from 750.
Add Comment
To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.
|
I4U Aug. 24, 2008 - 2:46 am
|