Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB Video Card
|
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
|
Max Slowik
Kurtis
Sapphire
Oct. 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video, Power, and Overclocking

HQV
 |
Standard Definition |
 |
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
PowerColor Radeon HD 4850 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
0
Score (130 = highest)
149.5
HQV
 |
High Definition |
 |
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
PowerColor Radeon HD 4850 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
0
Score (100 = highest)
115
ATI's universal decoder shines here, and does much better than NVIDIA's previous generation, and for the nitpicker, does a better job handling moire than the HD 3850 (although the scores do not reflect this within HQVs scoring scheme).

Power Consumption
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
PowerColor Radeon HD 4850 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
0
Watts (lower is better)
109.25
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
PowerColor Radeon HD 4850 512MB
0
Watts (lower is better)
109.25
And here's where all the not-quite-there performance makes up for it. For the casual enthusiast (oh that shouldn't make sense) who is more concerned with energy performance than high-def gaming, this is a card to beat. I mean, yes, it idles a little higher than a 3850, but even that's not by much. At under 50 loaded watts, I'm even somewhat surprised that the heatsink isn't passive.
The fan, with the drivers I have, couldn't be tweaked. It's not good, but it's not annoying. You might mistake it for an over-zealous CPU fan, and thankfully, you will be able to tweak it down the road, that much Sapphire has confirmed for me. Which would be great, since the card doesn't get over 60 degrees and doesn't need that much cooling, anyway. In the meanwhile, the fan's speed doesn't vary, the pitch doesn't shift, and it's not really distracting, something I wish other 4000-series cards would take to heart.

Overclocking
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
0
MHz (higher is better)
1311
0
MHz (higher is better)
1311
I was able to overclock the memory a clean 140MHz, or 14%; this serves to add much-needed memory bandwidth, and helps close the gap between it and the other cards well. The core, on the other hand, only overclocked 28MHz, more, or just three percent. This is either a fluke or a bad sign. It's certainly not the cooling, which is more than adequate.
Add Comment
To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.
|
Fidgit Oct. 27, 2009 - 11:10 pm
|