Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 512MB TOXIC Video Card
|
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
|
Max Slowik
Kurtis
Sapphire
Nov. 3, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video, Power, and Overclocking

HQV
 |
Standard Definition |
 |
EVGA GeForce GTX 260 896MB FTW
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 512MB Toxic
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 512MB Toxic
PNY GeForce 9800 GTX 512MB XLR8
0
Score (130 = highest)
149.5
HQV
 |
High Definition |
 |
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 512MB Toxic
EVGA GeForce GTX 260 896MB FTW
PNY GeForce 9800 GTX 512MB XLR8
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 512MB Toxic
0
Score (100 = highest)
115
Like all 4000-series cards, Sapphire's 4870 excels with video.

Power Consumption
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
EVGA GeForce GTX 260 896MB FTW
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 512MB Toxic
PNY GeForce 9800 GTX 512MB XLR8
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 512MB Toxic
0
Watts (lower is better)
149.5
PNY GeForce 9800 GTX 512MB XLR8
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 512MB Toxic
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 512MB Toxic
EVGA GeForce GTX 260 896MB FTW
0
Watts (lower is better)
149.5
I'm surprised that there isn't any difference with power consumption. Which is a good thing, since the card can only really consume more power. The overclocking doesn’t come out of over-volting, just good silicon binning.
But, like most would have suspected, the clear victory is in noise reduction. Thermals, at stock, temperature-controlled speeds, were easily fifteen degrees cooler than a normal heatsink. Twenty degrees, given the right case and airflow, is doubtlessly possible, as this card didn't break 65 degrees under load in my testing. The variation in noise tone while the fan's speed matched the GPU temperature was muted, although the fan was audible at both load and idle. But hang on.
I went ahead and manually set the fan speed to a fixed 25%--I couldn't hear the difference up to about 35%, but for the sake of setting the fan to its slowest--and the GPU never got past 75 degrees. It was inaudible at such low fan speeds, and still cooler than a stock heatsink by about ten degrees. Definitely worth holding out for.

Overclocking
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
0
MHz (higher is better)
1322.5
0
MHz (higher is better)
1322.5
Not to be content with CCCs defaults, this card has added overhead in Catalyst Control Center's overclocking page compared to regular 4870s. The card hit the GPU utility ceiling of 820MHz, and I suspect there are 20-30 more under the hood for Riva tuners. The memory hit 1150 MHz, though, which was just awesome. That's an overall 10% over factory clocks, but an impressive 20% improvement over stock.
Add Comment
To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.
|
VICE Nov. 20, 2009 - 7:17 pm
Wired Nov. 20, 2009 - 7:07 pm
BBC Nov. 20, 2009 - 6:38 pm
Wired Nov. 16, 2009 - 11:56 pm
|