Sapphire Radeon HD 4830 512MB
|
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
|
Max Slowik
Brian
Sapphire
Feb. 20, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video, Power, and Overclocking

HQV
 |
Standard Definition |
 |
Sapphire Radeon HD 4830 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 512MB Toxic
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9800 GT 512MB AMP!
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
0
Score (130 = highest)
149.5
HQV
 |
High Definition |
 |
Zotac GeForce 9800 GT 512MB AMP!
Sapphire Radeon HD 4830 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 512MB Toxic
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
0
Score (100 = highest)
115
ATI, always a little ahead of NVIDIA with these generations of video cards, delivers a slightly better HQV score. I do notice the moire, but it only lasts a split-second and only after skipping around in the video stream. The rest is picture-perfect.

Power Consumption
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4830 512MB
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9800 GT 512MB AMP!
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 512MB Toxic
0
Watts (lower is better)
138
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9800 GT 512MB AMP!
Sapphire Radeon HD 4830 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 512MB Toxic
0
Watts (lower is better)
138
Another no-surprises test, the power consumption is a little on the high side, but not higher than the faster cards in this comparison. I think the performance trade-off is worth it, seeing how at the very worst, you're using 40 more watts than the much slower 4670.
The cooling does its part really well, keeping the core or below 50 degrees at idle and under 70 degrees under load. This might sound high, but all the HD 4800s run warm, and this is chilly by comparison. The fan doesn't slow down to the point where it's ever inaudible but it's a lot quieter than a 4850 under load, and despite its looks, actually impresses me all-around.

Overclocking
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
0
MHz (higher is better)
1357
0
MHz (higher is better)
1357
And the cooling really shows its merits here. A 20% overclock on the core, and a 30% memory overclock. This did work out to be about a 15-25% improvement over its stock scores, and single-handedly earns this card my endorsement. A 25% overclock on a stock video card without zealous cooling? This one's easy to recommend.
Add Comment
To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.
|
VICE Nov. 20, 2009 - 7:17 pm
Wired Nov. 20, 2009 - 7:07 pm
BBC Nov. 20, 2009 - 6:38 pm
Wired Nov. 16, 2009 - 11:56 pm
|