Quantcast
BROWSE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
Sapphire Radeon HD 4550 512MB
 
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
Max Slowik
Max
Sapphire
Jun. 8, 2009
Article Specifications Images User Reviews (0) Comments (2)
DX9, OpenGL, and Synthetics


Half-Life 2 Episode 2 @ 1440x900
(Show All Graphs)
No AA 4xAA
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon 4550 512MB
105
101
81
54
32
0
FPS (higher is better)
120.75
 
 
No AA 4xAA
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon 4550 512MB
92
74
54
43
24
0
FPS (higher is better)
120.75
 
 

Half-Life 2 Episode 2 @ 1680x1050
(Show All Graphs)
No AA 4xAA
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon 4550 512MB
87
85
62
40
31
0
FPS (higher is better)
100.05
 
 
No AA 4xAA
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon 4550 512MB
70
58
44
32
22
0
FPS (higher is better)
100.05
 
 


Quake Wars @ 1440x900
(Show All Graphs)
No AA 4xAA
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon 4550 512MB
100
99
98
64
38
0
FPS (higher is better)
115
 
 
No AA 4xAA
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon 4550 512MB
98
89
77
42
28
0
FPS (higher is better)
115
 
 

Quake Wars @ 1680x1050
(Show All Graphs)
No AA 4xAA
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon 4550 512MB
100
90
90
52
30
0
FPS (higher is better)
115
 
 
No AA 4xAA
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon 4550 512MB
76
52
47
33
22
0
FPS (higher is better)
115
 
 


3DMark Vantage @ 1280x1024
(Show All Graphs)
Score GPU CPU
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon 4550 512MB
3910
3302
3063
1976
1129
0
Score (higher is better)
7095.5
 
 
Score GPU CPU
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon 4550 512MB
3648
3498
2858
1612
887
0
Score (higher is better)
7095.5
 
 
Score GPU CPU
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon 4550 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
6170
6168
6118
6110
6052
0
Score (higher is better)
7095.5
 
 


3DMark '06 @ 1280x1024
(Show All Graphs)
Score SM 2.0 HDR / SM 3.0 CPU
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
11086
10002
7848
5764
0
Score (higher is better)
12748.9
 
 
Score SM 2.0 HDR / SM 3.0 CPU
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
5160
4514
2914
2356
0
Score (higher is better)
12748.9
 
 
Score SM 2.0 HDR / SM 3.0 CPU
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
4840
4196
3527
2126
0
Score (higher is better)
12748.9
 
 
Score SM 2.0 HDR / SM 3.0 CPU
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
2756
2746
2739
2702
0
Score (higher is better)
12748.9
 
 


PCMark Vantage @ 1280x1024
(Show All Graphs)
TV & Movies Gaming
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon 4550 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
2837
2716
2667
2211
2098
0
Score (higher is better)
4969.15
 
 
TV & Movies Gaming
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon 4550 512MB
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
4321
4301
4025
3363
2837
0
Score (higher is better)
4969.15
 
 


Windows Vista Experience
(Show All Graphs)
Aero Graphics Gaming Graphics
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon 4550 512MB
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.9
5
0
Score (higher is better)
6.785
 
 
Aero Graphics Gaming Graphics
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon 4550 512MB
5.9
5.9
5.7
5.5
5.2
0
Score (higher is better)
6.785
 
 

Performance Notes

With older titles, things pick up a little, but are in no way praiseworthy.

 
<< Previous
Page 4 of 6
Next >>
Page 1: Introduction, The Card & Bundle
Page 2: Specifications and Setup
Page 3: DirectX 10 Titles
Page 4: DX9, OpenGL, and Synthetics
Page 5: Video, Power, and Overclocking
Page 6: Conclusion


2 User Comments
1 - Posted by Audio/Video nerd on November 12, 2009 - 6:27 pm

There are so many reviews out there that test gaming performance; but they forget about the growing community of HTPC enthusiast that don’t game, but want an optimal solution to rip, organize, store and render high definition media. Some reviews include how much the onboard graphics card offloads the CPU wrt H.246, VC1 and MPEG decoding, but neglect image quality. Therefore, the brief inclusion of image quality here is a very good start of a trend in reviewing graphics cards for the benefit of us AV nerds in building a HTPC. Good job.

I am building an optimal HTPC and want the highest possible price/performance ratio. It should be cheap, energy efficient, quiet and fully capable of processing high def content. Some gaming capability with Empire Total War and MS Flight simulator won’t hurt but is not necessary at this point.

How about the following graphics cards?

HIS H467QS1GP (Radeon 4670): USD 75 (including shipping)
HIS H467QSS1GP (Radeon 4670): USD 100 (including shipping)
Force3D RADEON HD 4550 DDR3 (fanless): USD 60 (including shipping)

Which one ?

Other parts of my setup:

CASE: NSK2480 – quiet case with a reasonably quiet 380w PSU: USD 70

CPU: Intel E7500 – cheap, the extra cache of the E8xx series CPUs do nothing for processing media. USD 100

CPU cooler: Ninja mini – cheap, low profile and don’t require a fan. USD 30
MB: Gigabyte EG45M-UD2H – build quality. I have been an Asus fan for long and been considering P5Q-EM and P5N7A-VM; but after problems with the latter board and the decline in quality of Asus boards I choose to switch to Gigabyte, that is rising in quality boards. USD 110
HDD: Hitachi 7K100.C 500 GB and 7K100.C 1TB….Those are very quiet, energy efficient and fast drives with only one platter per 500GB. Total: USD 150

BD: LITEON iHOS108 – the era of optical disks will end, so I won’t bother with paying the double for writing BDs. I need a cheap, fast and quiet drive for playing, ripping DVDs and BDs. With full read speed (during ripping), it is noisy but it’s quiet during normal BD play. USD 100.

OS: WinXP pro – considered Ubuntu 9.10 and windows7…. With Ubuntu, you are limited to VDPAU capable GF cards, no BD playback. Moreover, in Japan there is no support for TV tuner cards under Linux. Linux as HTPC = NG. Windows7 (USD 200) has a better media center s/w solution but XP is still faster and more stable.
MediaCenter: MediaPortal – considered XBMC 9.11, but it does not allow me to spawn external players and has very few configuration options.
DVD and BD s/w player: PowerDVD Ultra 9– excellent DVD playback with its True Theater effects.
Matroska and m2ts player: KMPlayer with FFDshow and AC3filer --- great player with tons of configuration options.

2 - Posted by Max Slowik on November 13, 2009 - 4:36 pm

If you're willing to spend up to $100 on a video card you should just get a 4770. A 5750 will future-proof the machine for $130, and you'll find that the video playback is slightly better. I think you'll also find that AMD processors in your price range are better deals and performers than Core 2 processors and will let you get a gaming card.

I'd skip PowerDVD or any software you have to pay for. If you're considering XP use XBMC or better yet, Boxee. For codecs get the K-Lite Codec Pack.

Windows Vista and 7 have excellent media centers, and they're very similar. Way better than what you'll see with XP (although Boxee is pretty sweet and runs on all versions of Windows).

Add Comment

To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.

Username: *


Password: (optional)
(Remember my login information: )

Comment: *


What is 6+2?: *


 
 
 
Recent News
Jason Bradbury Mar. 19, 2010 - 10:52 pm
joystiq Mar. 19, 2010 - 6:58 pm
Mar. 19, 2010 - 2:25 am
Rock Paper Shotgun Mar. 18, 2010 - 11:58 pm
Fudzilla Mar. 18, 2010 - 11:57 pm
CVG Mar. 18, 2010 - 11:53 pm
Tech Radar Mar. 16, 2010 - 11:58 pm
Mar. 16, 2010 - 11:50 pm