Sapphire Radeon HD 4650 512MB
|
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
|
Max Slowik
Brian
Sapphire
Jun. 25, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
DirectX 10 Titles

Company of Heroes @ 1440x900
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4650 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4550 512MB
0
FPS (higher is better)
62.1
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4650 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4550 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
0
FPS (higher is better)
62.1
Company of Heroes @ 1680x1050
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4650 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4550 512MB
0
FPS (higher is better)
51.75
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4650 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4550 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
0
FPS (higher is better)
51.75

Crysis @ 1440x900
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4650 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4550 512MB
0
FPS (higher is better)
56.35
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4650 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4550 512MB
0
FPS (higher is better)
56.35
Crysis @ 1680x1050
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4650 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4550 512MB
0
FPS (higher is better)
52.9
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4650 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4550 512MB
0
FPS (higher is better)
52.9

Unreal Tournament 3 @ 1440x900
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4650 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4550 512MB
0
FPS (higher is better)
108.1
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4650 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4550 512MB
0
FPS (higher is better)
108.1
Unreal Tournament 3 @ 1680x1050
(Show All Graphs)
(Collapse Graphs)
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4650 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4550 512MB
0
FPS (higher is better)
95.45
Leadtek GeForce 9600 GSO 384MB Extreme
Chaintech GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
Diamond Radeon HD 3870 1GB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4650 512MB
Zotac GeForce 9500 GT 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 4550 512MB
0
FPS (higher is better)
95.45
Performance Notes
With these DX 10 games, it’s clear that in some cases, spending the extra 30% for an HD 4670 equals getting a 30% speed boost. But more importantly, there are other times when the 4650 is as little as 10% behind it’s better budget brother. It also wails on the 9500 GT, which yes, costs less, but not that much less. I still wouldn’t game with it at resolutions higher than 1440x900 or 1280x1024.
Add Comment
To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.
|
VICE Nov. 20, 2009 - 7:17 pm
Wired Nov. 20, 2009 - 7:07 pm
BBC Nov. 20, 2009 - 6:38 pm
Wired Nov. 16, 2009 - 11:56 pm
|