Quantcast
BROWSE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
Soyo P4I875P Dragon 2 Platinum Edition
 
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
Brian Kristensen
Kurtis
Soyo
Aug. 22, 2003
Performance

Now for the fun part. I will be comparing the Soyo Dragon 2 PE to the Asus P4P800 VM, seeing as it is the only other P4 board I have. All tests were run on the exact same system on a fresh install of WinXP and the latest drivers for sound and video.

Test Rig

Intel P4 2.4c Hyperthreading processor
2x Corsair PC3500 512MB in single and dual channel modes
Geforce 4 Ti4200 128MB
Sound Blaster Live!
200GB Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 (fresh format and install of WinXP)
LiteOn 16X DVD
420W Thermaltake PSU

Benchmarking software:

Sisoft Sandra Pro
Aida32
ScienceMark
PC Mark 02
3D Mark 03 (330 patch)
3D Mark 01 SE
Vulpine GLMark

SiSoft Sandra CPU Arithmetic
(Show All Graphs)
ALU FPU ISSE2
Dragon 2 PE (Single Channel)
Dragon 2 PE (Dual Channel)
P4P800-VM (Single Channel)
P4P800-VM (Dual Channel)
7365
7220
6681
7109
0
Performance (Higher is Better)
8000
 
 
ALU FPU ISSE2
Dragon 2 PE (Single Channel)
Dragon 2 PE (Dual Channel)
P4P800-VM (Single Channel)
P4P800-VM (Dual Channel)
2060
2060
2063
2062
0
Performance (Higher is Better)
8000
 
 
ALU FPU ISSE2
Dragon 2 PE (Single Channel)
Dragon 2 PE (Dual Channel)
P4P800-VM (Single Channel)
P4P800-VM (Dual Channel)
4336
4596
4596
4419
0
Performance (Higher is Better)
8000
 
 

Both boards perform about the same during single channel testing, but the P4P800-VM seems to fall behind during single channel ALU Performance while the Dragon 2 is up to standard.

SiSoft Sandra CPU Multimedia
(Show All Graphs)
Int Float
Dragon 2 PE (Single Channel)
Dragon 2 PE (Dual Channel)
P4P800-VM (Single Channel)
P4P800-VM (Dual Channel)
11011
11008
11025
11013
0
Performance (Higher is Better)
20000
 
 
Int Float
Dragon 2 PE (Single Channel)
Dragon 2 PE (Dual Channel)
P4P800-VM (Single Channel)
P4P800-VM (Dual Channel)
17619
17201
17616
17588
0
Performance (Higher is Better)
20000
 
 

Both boards do quite well, but the P4P800-VM is a bit slower during float calculations.

 
<< Previous
Page 5 of 9
Next >>
Page 1: Introduction
Page 2: Board Layout
Page 3: Features & Accessories
Page 4: BIOS
Page 5: Test Rig & Sandra CPU Benchmarks
Page 6: Sandra & Aida32 Memory Benchmarks
Page 7: ScienceMark & PCMark02 Benchmarks
Page 8: 3dMark01, 3DMark03, & GLMark Benchmarks
Page 9: Overclocking & Conclusion
Subscribe to Motherboards [more info]


4 User Comments
1 - Posted by Kurtis on August 21, 2003 - 11:41 pm

feeding time is the best over @ Brian's house ;) ;)

2 - Posted by Rich on August 22, 2003 - 9:09 am

Who manufactures the Gigabit ethernet controller on that board?

3 - Posted by Brian on August 22, 2003 - 12:36 pm

Intel.

4 - Posted by Rich on August 22, 2003 - 12:48 pm

The reason I asked is because I have seen a lot of problems with Broadcom Gigabit controllers, especially with onboard Ethernet. Thanks for info :D

Add Comment

To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.

Username: *


Password: (optional)
(Remember my login information: )

Comment: *


What is 1+2?: *


 
 
 
Recent News
Jason Bradbury Mar. 19, 2010 - 10:52 pm
joystiq Mar. 19, 2010 - 6:58 pm
Mar. 19, 2010 - 2:25 am
Rock Paper Shotgun Mar. 18, 2010 - 11:58 pm
Fudzilla Mar. 18, 2010 - 11:57 pm
CVG Mar. 18, 2010 - 11:53 pm
Tech Radar Mar. 16, 2010 - 11:58 pm
Mar. 16, 2010 - 11:50 pm