Quantcast
BROWSE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
Swiftech H20-8500 Water Cooling Kit w/ GPU Block
 
Author:
Editor:
Sponsor:
Published:
Brian Kristensen
Kurtis
Swiftech
Sep. 3, 2003
Installation

I won't go through the installation process here, as it is documented very well here and in the guides included with the kit.

I find that this kit was extremely easy to install. Simply mount the hardware, cut the tubing to the correct lengths and push them into the quick connect fittings. Filling and bleeding the kit was pretty easy, but I would have preferred a reservoir over the fill and bleed kit any day. Of course, before you even think about powering on your computer, run the pump overnight to check for any leaks.


There were no leaks at all when installing this kit. Swiftech has done a damn good job building quality components that fit together perfectly. I can't say the same about the other water cooling kits I have tested in the past.

Performance

I tested this kit against the Iceberg 1 and the Crossover Mission 5 on a P4 2.4C. Idle tests were run with the computer running in Windows XP for about an hour to let the temperature stabilize. Load tests were done using Prime95 for an hour. I used the two 80mm fans included with the kit during testing.

The case temperature was within .5*C of 32*C during all testing.

Swiftech H20-8500 Performance
(Show All Graphs)
Idle Load
Swiftech w/o GPU
Swiftech w/ GPU
Mission 5
Iceberg 1
Stock P4 Heatsink
35
40
36
38
35
0
Temperature ( °C )
100
 
 
Idle Load
Swiftech w/o GPU
Swiftech w/ GPU
Mission 5
Iceberg 1
Stock P4 Heatsink
51
55
50
51
55
0
Temperature ( °C )
100
 
 

As you can tell from the graphs, the performance of the H20-8500 wasn't that great at all. I was pretty sure the low performance was due to the small radiator, and as it turned out, I was right. When using a plain 120mm radiator with two 120mm fans in a push/pull configuration, the temperatures drop greatly.

Swiftech w/ 120mm Radiator
(Show All Graphs)
Idle Load
Swiftech w/o GPU
Swiftech w/ GPU
Swiftech w/o GPU (120mm rad)
Swiftech w/ GPU (120mm rad)
35
40
35
35
0
Temperature ( °C )
100
 
 
Idle Load
Swiftech w/o GPU
Swiftech w/ GPU
Swiftech w/o GPU (120mm rad)
Swiftech w/ GPU (120mm rad)
51
55
47
47
0
Temperature ( °C )
100
 
 

With only one 120mm fan, the temperatures increased roughly 1*C. With an even better radiator, such as the Black Ice Extreme, or the Dtek Pro Core, this kit could kick some serious ass.

The MCW50 GPU water block dropped the temperature of our Geforce 4 Ti4200 by about 10 degrees Celsius from the Vantec Iceberq 4 Pro, without sacrificing the CPU temperature much. With the 120mm radiator, there was no temperature increase when adding the GPU block to the loop.

 
<< Previous
Page 7 of 8
Next >>
Page 1: Introduction
Page 2: MCW5000 CPU Water Block
Page 3: MCW50 GPU Water Block
Page 4: MCR80-F Radiator
Page 5: MCP300 Pump
Page 6: Fill / Bleed Kit & Other Hardware
Page 7: Installation & Performance
Page 8: Conclusion
Subscribe to Water Cooling [more info]


7 User Comments
1 - Posted by handrail on September 4, 2003 - 10:12 am

so far i have not been terribly impressed by water cooling. my vantec aeroflow stays around 40 during gaming and below 34 at idle.

i'm sure there are great h20 coolers out there for the big $$$$. but thus far, nothing has convinced me to make the switch.

2 - Posted by MaNiAk21 on September 4, 2003 - 3:28 pm

Well, there's a big difference between the performance of a kit and the performance of your custom system... it does cost more, but if you get the right items, the cooling should be amazing...

3 - Posted by handrail on September 4, 2003 - 9:01 pm

yeah, i understand that if i spend mega bux i can get ultra cool, ultra quiet machine. but, if the cheap ones run ~$200-300 and my cheap old $25 vantec can beat the kit water coolers, why are companies bothering making them.

my guess is because they are hoping to get that "it's cool to have watercooling" (bad pun, groan :cry: ) section of the market. but, most everyone who would use liquid cooling surely knows not to buy a crap kit.

just an observation on the industry. seems like they are wasting time and money...but someone must be buying these things...right???

4 - Posted by MaNiAk21 on September 4, 2003 - 9:15 pm

It's just the quiet issue that comes to play, some are perfectly fine with shelling out cash for ultra-quiet, entry-level cooling. I for one would not, but there are a lot of people out there with cash to burn...

5 - Posted by Hippy on September 5, 2003 - 12:44 pm

i am a little curious about your temp readings.

The difference in degrees C between the kit without the GPU block compaired to with is massive: 5c at idle.

Guessing that these are CPU readings?

That is a bit much... i mean to warm any amount of water by even a single degree takes a load of wattage/heat. I dont know the exact calculation but have read in other forums that the temps shouldn't raise by much, if at all by adding a GPU block. Hmmm (if i can find the thread then i'll link it) just seems wrong, could anything be wrong with the kit?

Cracking review though :)

6 - Posted by T-shirt on September 5, 2003 - 1:40 pm

I just quick scanned the review (no time today, I'll get back to it, I promise)
But I would guess the difference is caused by several factors.
Rad is too small, unable to deal with the extra heat,

addition of the gpu block is slowing the flow below the needed flow for the CPU block

error- in adding the gpu block you changed the CPU block/paste/cpu interface to a slightly less effective combo

7 - Posted by Brian on September 5, 2003 - 5:20 pm

The card that we tested with emits a LOT of heat. It can get in to the 60s ( ~temp read by probe on back of card (opposite of core)).

Since the radiator can't dissipate alot of heat, adding the GPU block caused the temps to increase alot (especially since the GPU gets hotter than the CPU in this case). With the 120mm radiator, you will notice no change in the CPU temp when adding the VGA block to the loop.

Add Comment

To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.

Username: *


Password: (optional)
(Remember my login information: )

Comment: *


What is 1+2?: *