Quantcast
BROWSE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
Friday August 1, 2008
General | Posted by Max at 5:43 pm


Nvidia losing support from motherboard makers @ Fudzilla
The word on the street is even more worrying, as we're hearing rumours of Nvidia considering to pulling out of the chipset business altogether. Considering that Intel didn't grant Nvidia a QPI license, what is left for Nvidia's chipset business? Not much, that's for sure and with the announcement last month that Nvidia will use the nForce 200 bridge chip as a solution for adding SLI to the X58 platform, these rumours might not be too far from the truth.

Nvidia Reportedly Plans To Exit The Chipset Business; Lehman Contends Report Is Incorrect (Updated) @ Barron's
But Lehman analyst Tim Luke writes this morning that his checks with Nvidia management in both the U.S. and Taiwan finds that the company remains committed to staying in the chipset business, which is 17%-18% of Nvidia’s revenues.

Nvidia 790i board pulled by makers @ the Inquirer
Now comes word that their high-end desktop mobo, famous for rumored data corruption problems, is being silently killed. The three companies mentioned above have pulled the boards from their product pages without so much as a footnote. The pages for Foxconn and Gigabyte look like this, note the lack of high end NV parts.

All Nvidia G84 and G86s are bad @ the Inquirer
The official story is that it was a batch of end-of-life parts that used a different bonding/substrate process for only that batch. Once again, the trusty INQUIRER bullshit detectors went off so loudly that the phone almost vibrated out of my hand. More than enough people tell us both the G84 and G86 use the same ASIC across the board, and no changes were made during their lives.


One thing that's not being mentioned is that 790i was pretty bad to begin with, 780a has it beat every way; maybe they're just updating their lines. Then again, they didn't pull their previous Intel chipsets, or for that matter, any other chipset no matter how outmoded it was.

Nope, it's just bad.
Comments [4]
 
Monday July 28, 2008
Hardware | Posted by Max at 8:45 pm
Right after 9800GTX+, NVIDIA begin shrinking 9600GT to 55nm. But this time is a bit different, there will not be another plus mark after 9600GT’s name because NVIDIA want more stealth.

The only change of 55nm version is the mark on die. The mark on a 65nm die is G94-300-A1 and 55nm die is G94-300-B1. The clock keeps 650MHz/1625MHz/900MHz (core/shader/mem) so more overclocking headroom can be leave to customers and vendor partners.

The gray area shows 55nm die is a bit slim than 65nm die.


It's not terrible, since there won't be any real differences in performance, stock-clocked as they'll be. So this isn't Yet Another SKU To Confuse Customers. But I also hesitate to think of how cool it would be to have an even nicer 9600 GT; NVIDIA could use the thing to prop up their appearances with their partners.
Comments [0]
[Read Full Story at Expreview]
Sunday July 27, 2008
Electronics | Posted by Max at 10:09 pm


Although the Eee is my favorite laptop for traveling, its Xandros-based Linux distribution is getting crufty and beginning to show its age. I was unable to install Firefox 3 on it, for instance, because it lacks a current version of the GTK+ toolkit. In preparation for OSCON, I decided to infuse my Eee with new life by installing Ubuntu 8.04. I used a community-driven derivative called Ubuntu Eee that is designed specifically for Eee laptops. It has nearly full hardware compatibility right out of the box, including support for suspend/resume, sound, and the built-in webcam.


If only it were so easy to install any Linux distro on hardware intended to run a Linux distro... Ubiquitous Ubuntu is actually not a straight-forward affair, and it's always nice to have help, even if it's so few steps.

I still like the Mini Note better. When are we gonna get some dual-core nettops? I'm just not willing to jump on the bandwagon until then, it seems. I have this desire to not wait, give up, and go get more coffee while the machine resizes a picture for the news. Maybe that's wrong of me; I also like my coffee cold. Bizarre.
Comments [0]
[Read Full Story at Ars Technica]
Tuesday July 22, 2008
General | Posted by Max at 11:42 pm


Well, since we all know how cool DX11 and multi-GPU is going to be, wait, maybe we don't.

GFW Live Goes Free, DirectX 11 Unveiled @ Kotaku
Games for Windows - Live multiplayer features are free, effective today, Microsoft announced at today's GameFest 2008 conference in Seattle.
...
In other news from GameFest, DirectX 11 was unveiled [and adds the ability for] compute shader technology that lays the groundwork for the GPU to be used for more than just 3D graphics, so that developers can take advantage of the graphics card as a parallel processor.


But the Shuga Shack makes a more interesting, real point:

Games for Windows Takes on Steam @ Shacknews
Microsoft today announced that its Games for Windows initiative is set to expand with the launch an online PC gaming marketplace this fall. The service will deliver free and paid downloadable game content, along with trailers, demos, and other content comparable to the company's Xbox Live offerings.

In addition to the added features, the Games for Windows Live interface will also be redesigned to be "much more PC friendly." Microsoft has not yet specified whether full games will be made available for purchase on the network.


Which, as far as I can tell, isn't going to stop people from using Steam--it's not like you can't just install both. And how else are you going to hear the magic words, "Gordon Freeman, is that really you?" And maybe it'll have the side effect of forcing Valve to make Steam less... camouflagey.

don't ask my why astroboy was the result of the search terms "god live sucks", but it was either that or someone's faith splattered all over photobucket
Comments [0]
 
Monday July 21, 2008
Hardware | Posted by Max at 6:02 pm


So when the Radeon HD 4870 gets busy with a very graphics-intensive application and gets hot, the fan spins up. Not to a troublesome level, mind you, but enough to hear the whine in my super-quiet PC at home. In fact, some users are more concerned about the GPU temperature and have set the fan to manually spin at around 35–40%, claiming you "can't hear it." If I do that, I definitely hear it. It all depends on how much noise the rest of your machine makes.

So I stopped by my local PC white-box shop, Central Computers and picked up a Zalman VF900-Cu VGA cooler for $40 (you may find it, or similar products, online for a bit less). It's made to fit a variety of cards, including Radeon HD 3000 series; almost all the coolers that fit 3000 series cards fit the new 4000 series. After 15 minutes with a small screwdriver, it was installed and ready to roll, still taking up two slots as the card did before.


Make no mistake, this is a bad idea. The power regulation hardware on a card that can pull 125W needs a lot of love, and the last thing it wants is to breathe freely. At least take some of the spare memory heatsinks and put them on farcically.

Because you know what makes even less noise than a Zalman heatsink? A block of wood. Classier than some rolled up newspaper duct taped to the front of the card, a block of wood still drives home the point that you hate computers and like house fires.

Extra: redemption for people smart enough not to follow in Extremish footsteps.
Comments [0]
[Read Full Story at Extreme Tech]
Friday July 18, 2008
General | Posted by Max at 2:17 pm
A few days ago, we published a story about how much better our Eee PC 1000H performed when we swapped the system’s 5,400rpm Seagate Momentus hard drive out for a Samsung SATA II SSD drive. Not only did the system boot faster and all apps load faster, but we got 20 more minutes of battery life with the SSD.

However, when we posted our story, we heard from users that Tom’s Hardware, a site we admire a great deal, recently published an article which claims that SSDs use more power than traditional hard drives. The Tom’s Hardware story got some major attention from sites like Engadget and even got a responses from SSD-makers Super Talent and Micron, who both claim that the drives used in the Tom’s test are “early generation” and therefore more power hungry than newer models.

Is Tom’s Hardware right? We don’t think so.


So yeah, now Tom's goes an retracts their previous article, but not without some apologetic prosthelytizing:

Flash SSD Update: More Results, Answers @ Tom's Hardware
First of all, we want to take this opportunity and apologize to our readers, for we made a procedural mistake when we compared battery runtime of various Flash SSDs, which we used to replace a 7,200 RPM hard drive on a business notebook in an effort to compare battery life of SSDs versus a conventional hard drive. As it was commented by our readers (see comments of that article) and other sources (thanks, George), part of the test procedure was inaccurate because of varying workload. This may cause other system components such as the CPU to be used more intensively, hence contributing to draining the battery earlier than on a slower drive.

The conclusion, however, that Flash SSDs are often misleadingly presented as energy savers to increase your battery mileage on notebooks, is not invalidated. The truth is that more and more Flash SSDs will be increasingly efficient. But many conventional hard drives can also be more efficient than today’s Flash SSDs in the scenarios some of you were demanding: when providing data under a defined workload such as video playback or in idle until the notebook battery runs empty.


But you know what, it doesn't matter, not when a good 64GB drive'll cost you nine hundred dollars. Speaking of cool, cheap things, has anyone noticed that AMD ninja-released a 3GHz Brisbane? It's, like, less than $100. Woot.
Comments [0]
[Read Full Story at LAPTOP Magazine]
Thursday July 17, 2008
Hardware | Posted by Max at 10:30 pm


When AMD began talking about no longer building high end hardware using single monolithic GPUs a few weeks back, we let them know that improving CrossFire support would be incredibly important going forward. AMD told us that they are putting a lot into that but also that they have some exciting technology up their sleeves with R700 to help out as well. Unfortunately, we haven't gotten as much detailed information on how it works, but the new technology is GPU to GPU communication.

Until now, CrossFire has done zero GPU to GPU or framebuffer to framebuffer communication. As with the first iteration, each card fully renders the parts of the screen for which it is responsible (be it a whole frame in AFR, the top or bottom half of a screen, or alternating tiles). These results are sent to a combiner where the digital signals are merged and output to the screen. This is the only communication that takes place in CrossFire at the moment. R700 will change that by allowing GPUs to communicate.


Eff why eye, the card's got two gigs of RAM. Which means that 1GB 4870s had better be around the corner. All these hardware releases sure are making the 4850 seem like a really great buy. And I hope that this direct GPU-to-GPU connection makes a larger real-world difference, driver tweakage pending. Also, why are there still no custom templates for CrossFire? Jeez, you've got working drivers, and a perfectly good NVIDIA control panel to copy, ATI. Hop to it.

Stream of conscious commentary ending in three, two... My cores can beat up your cores.
Comments [0]
[Read Full Story at Anandtech]
General | Posted by Max at 9:52 pm


Ever wonder why some PSUs claiming huge wattages are so cheap? Why should you buy a branded one - or are you just paying for the name and some fancy cables?

Well, no, you're paying for the fact that it won't blow up - that's why we test PSUs to their limits and we never, ever recommend anything other than branded products. Some people don't listen though and Corsair recently took it upon itself to test some of shoddiest looking power supplies we've seen.


I gotta admit, I had never heard of "smoke burning stoves" before searching for images of computer fires. Computer fires not laptops. But those things look cool! I'm going to have to find/ make one and take it camping. Maybe not a full-ATX variety... Any excuse to Dremel, really.

A link to a dude's mahg-type smoke-burning stove project.

Oh yeah, don't buy cheap power supplies. That's dumb.
Comments [2]
[Read Full Story at Bit-Tech]
Wednesday July 16, 2008
Hardware | Posted by Max at 9:48 pm
When testing with games such as Crysis, we quickly discovered that the X48 chipset was able to deliver 10% more performance when compared to the X38, while it was slightly faster than the P45. While this was impressive, Crossfire is not all that well suited to Crysis, so we continued on and hit Devil May Cry 4, which works a treat.

Now when testing with the new hit title Devil May Cry 4 we found that a typical P45 setup is going to be 36% faster than a P35 system at 1920x1200 when running Crossfire Radeon HD 4850 graphics cards for example. The X48 was also roughly 6% faster than the P45 chipset, and I would suggest that this is a best case scenario for the high-end X48 chipset. That said, this did make the X48 around 15% faster than the older X38 chipset.

For the most part the X48 is just 5% faster than the cheaper P45 chipset, while this chipset held roughly the same margin over the older X38 chipset. Therefore as we see it, X38 owners really would need to purchase an X48 motherboard to see any real performance gains, while the P45 is a massive step up from the P35 chipset when talking Crossfire performance.


This came as a surprise to me, as I haven't really seen any good arguments to go from i3x to i4x outside of the coolness inherent to P45. The elegance of CrossFire and CFX--you know, cheapness--makes this mandatory reading if you're thinking of going multi-multi-GPU on the ATI front.

I mean, you could always buy AMD motherboards...

There are plenty of people who would wait for Nehalem, right? I think that's crazy. If you keep waiting for the next big thing, you'll never build your computer. But, AMD people, do wait for 790GX, for serious.
Comments [0]
[Read Full Story at legion Hardware]
Wednesday July 9, 2008
Hardware | Posted by Max at 6:38 pm
In order to lower production costs, Nvidia is expected to fully advance to 55nm generation manufacturing in the second half of this year and will have 4-5 new GPUs produced under 55nm before the end of this quarter, according to a Chinese-language Commercial Times report. Meanwhile both Nvidia and AMD are hoping to complete their 40nm tape-outs by the end of this year, the paper added.

The company's upcoming GPUs including G94b, G96b and G98b, which are scheduled to launch after August, will all use a 55nm process.


When NVIDIA was kickin' ass, they didn't touch 55nm, and now that they've reversed roles with ATI, they're doing exactly what ATI did. Seems kinda funny, but maybe it's also smart. This works nicely with a 9600 GT price drop--maybe they're also working on a 9600 GT+...
Comments [0]
[Read Full Story at DigiTimes]
Tuesday July 8, 2008
Hardware | Posted by Max at 10:36 pm


You've probably already heard about Nvidia's recent price cuts affecting its latest GT200 series cards. If you're not in the market for a high end graphics board, you probably weren't very impressed, as €400 is still a lot to pay for a graphics card, no matter how powerful it may be.

However, in the past week there were some pleasant changes in the sub-€100 price range as well, and this is what will interest most consumers. A couple of weeks ago we wrote about expected price drops for the HD3850 series, hoping it will end up around the €65 mark. We weren't far off, as reference cards are now available for €69 all over the place. In case a reference card just won't cut it for you, you can get PowerColor's overclocked 3850 with PCS cooling and 512MB of memory for just €10 more.


I just took one of my "old" HD 3850s--256MB versions, mind you--and stuck it in my HTPC. It replaced my HD 2600 Pro, which was starting to bug me on account of the fact that I really like the idea of PC gaming on my television, and it's not even about to cut it. Now, it's a home theater PC, so noise was a concern. Shouldn't have been, I cannot tell there's an actively-cooled card in there. I also run F@H on the GPU (FA@H on the CPU) and my score is growing about twice as fast. Not to mention gaming's sweeter on my HTPC than my Xbox 360; all you need is a few extra hundred dollars for a DiNovo Edge and a VX Nano...

Yeah, and a cheaper 9600 GT's cool, too.
Comments [0]
[Read Full Story at Fudzilla]
Thursday July 3, 2008
Electronics | Posted by Max at 9:11 pm
Sub-notebooks are revolutionising the way we look at portable connectivity. Gone are the days, it seems, where you paid a pretty penny for a ridiculously small and lightweight piece of hardware. Nowadays £300 will get you a cool mini-notebook in iPod white and still leave you with change to spare.

We've previously looked at Asus' 8.9" Eee PC 900 and the HP 2133 Mini-note, but now MSI is releasing it's first attempt to crack the sub-notebook market. The MSI Wind - make fart jokes at your peril.

Despite the fact that MSI told bit-tech it tried its absolute hardest to get the Wind to reach the £300 mark, what we've ended up with is closer to the £329 mark for the XP model instead. That's not exactly a budget killing sum - it's still cheaper than the HP - but it's still more than Asus' ubiquitous Eee PC 901.

Well, this is until we found the Linux version of the Wind on sale for a tidy £291.25. At this price it's very much a bargain.


I may soon find myself going the UMPC route. My laptop, faithful friend that it is, just isn't... small enough. I want a lappy that I can shove into my kick-ass Indiana Jones MkVII Gas Mask Bag. And AMD, thank you for my rockin' OGIO messenger, I've used it daily for a year now, but it's not... canvas movie memorabilia. So there you have it.

But don't worry, AMD. Your flag might still fly, if MSI ever gets off their collective ass and puts to market the fabled GX400, but I still haven't tried to Stream My Game.
Comments [2]
[Read Full Story at Bit-Tech]
General | Posted by Max at 8:42 pm


As of tomorrow, Nvidia plans to drop the prices of Geforce GTX 280 and 260. The reason for this sudden price cut is that the cards are not selling as well as Nvidia expected. The second part of the story is that Radeon HD 4870 ended up better than Nvidia had hoped.

Nvidia will cut $90 off the Geforce GTX 280 price-tag, but this is Nvidia's price to partners and we are not sure just how much this will affect the suggested e-tail price. We are sure that end user prices will also drop, but probably a bit less than $90.


It would be pretty sweet if NVIDIA figured out a way to cut the power consumption of the cards as easily as the prices. I mean, it's as if a disembodied voice whispered into the ears of power supply manufacturers, "If you build it, they will come." Suddenly, that 750W PSU seems a little cramped, and people are pricing out kilowatt units. With NVIDIA and AMD/ATI duking things out, seems like Seasonic and the rest are getting as great a deal as the customers.

What's really impressive is that it seems like price tags are equaling performance across the board now. That just seems backwards.

Extra: it's a bigger price cut than that.
Comments [0]
[Read Full Story at Fudzilla]
Tuesday July 1, 2008
Hardware | Posted by Max at 8:00 pm


AMD GPG (ex-ATI) is binning the parts to a lowest denominator required for good yields and a level of performance that reaches or sometimes overtakes Nvidia’s GTX 260. But this time around, the company developed an AIB/OEM-only product codenamed "Super RV770", which will be much more powerful.

The "Super RV770" will arrive with pre-installed water-cooling and features unlocked BIOS, which enables the GPU to be pushed all the way to 950 MHz, while the memory can be pushed to 4.8 GT/s (1.2 GHz QDR). According to our sources, you may be able to push the GPU even beyond 1 GHz, if you use TEC elements, and keep the temperature of GPU low.


About the only bright side I can see for this is that it means we're going to start seeing some hefty factory-overclocked HD 4870s, even if Super RV770 isn't likely to see the likes of Newegg's shelves. This is both cool and sad.

I wonder, though, has AMD sacrificed too much for OEMs? What do you people think?
Comments [0]
[Read Full Story at TG Daily]
Friday June 27, 2008
General | Posted by Max at 7:06 pm


This time we have something not-so-serious for all the modders out there with broken HDD(s).

I had some dead HDDs lying around and I started wondering what could I do with them. After opening one and testing if it still run, I couldn't resist scratching the spinning disk with a screw driver...


This is one step away from being a weapon.

Gads, I have at least three dead hard drives; there's got to be a way to harness their neodymium power and produce a spinfusor! I mean, they probably won't explode on contact, but they gotta at least be able to put out an eye! Alright, you handy modders, I task you all to make a viable spinfusor that fires actual hard drive platters. It had better be intimidating, and I'll bet Kurtis has a prize for such an awesome device.

you know what a spinfusor is, right kurtis?
Comments [1]
[Read Full Story at Metku Mods]
Thursday June 26, 2008
Hardware | Posted by Max at 9:57 pm
Eighteen months ago when nVidia's GeForce 8800 GTX was king of the hill, a multi-GPU setup was either ostentatious and reserved only for the most die hard gamer if you were using a high-end card, or downright silly if you were pairing up midrange and lower. NVIDIA's SLi initiative, started back with the GeForce 6 series, was basically a kludge designed to wring that last ounce of performance out of the cards of the era for the deep-pocketed enthusiasts. ATI's CrossFire, when it debuted up until the release of the Radeon X1950 Pro, was an embarassment, offering poorer performance and compatibility than NVIDIA's solution.

Flash forward to present day, and the advent of Windows Vista coupled the GeForce 8800GT and Radeon HD 3800 series has completely changed the game. NVIDIA's formerly industry standard drivers are now being beta tested on the consumer with each new release and resulting in stability problems in Windows Vista, and a merged AMD/ATI is fighting tooth and nail to stay in the game after the disastrous launches of the Phenom and HD 2900 lines. With the release of the HD 3800s, ATI had no intention of fighting NVIDIA's top end with a single monolithic GPU having learned their lesson from the 2900, and shifted their focus to producing cooler, cheaper, more efficient GPUs and attacking the price/performance market. Not just that, but to compete with NVIDIA's top end and empty the pockets of the die hard enthusiasts, ATI shifts their high end focus to running GPUs in tandem. The result? A rejuvenated, revitalized CrossFire.


I agree with everything in this review. I really can't fault it in any way. So I'm going to pick on the web design. The banner at the top, fine, you do what you gotta do. Those objects on the left? Wow, way to work the low-contrast gradient. Your mom tell you to do that? White and blue was dead back in 1998. There are no points for retro HTML, not even for the blinkinest of tags. Don't look now, but FrontPage is laughing at you.

the above image is the faint. i'm just listening to the faint, it doesn't have to do with video cards
Comments [0]
[Read Full Story at Benchmark Reviews]
Tuesday June 24, 2008
Electronics | Posted by Max at 11:01 pm


Bring Your Box of e-Junk to Office Depot @ ExtremeTech
Here is how the program works. Customers will choose from three available recycling boxes, sizes Small ($5), Medium ($10), and Large ($15), pack it with as many acceptable items as will fit, and take it to the nearest Office Depot store. From there the old tech trash will travel to a reprocessing facility and be turned into "tomorrow's resources."

There's gold in them thar cell phones @ Reuters
It's called "urban mining", scavenging through the scrap metal in old electronic products in search of such gems as iridium and gold, and it is a growth industry around the world as metal prices skyrocket.


I mean, their name is practically "the Office Despot". And all this time you thought you were being clever.

On the other hand, I've got mad junk floor to ceiling in my office. Assuming I get my act together, I'll totally take advantage of it. God knows I've tried eBay, but it's pretty hard to sell an office's worth of crap after it gets blasted into magic smoke by thundersnow.
Comments [0]
 
Friday June 20, 2008
Hardware | Posted by Max at 2:00 pm


Thanks in large part to this code sharing, we are seeing same-day support for the Radeon HD 4850/4870. If you buy a Radeon HD 4850/4870 today, you can go use it on Linux right away! They've actually been running the RV770 under Linux for about eight weeks now, which then gave them the idea and allowed them time to ship this driver to consumers via the driver CD included with the retail graphics cards. For the record, NVIDIA has never included Linux/FreeBSD/Solaris drivers on the disk with their graphics cards. While we would recommend always downloading the latest display drivers, this is a significant step forward and does reaffirm their commitment to the Linux operating system.


There's nothing I can add that's better than the insights the Phoronix guys have, but I will say this: having the drivers on the CD means the difference between getting your build going and giving up completely in the face of nothing else working right off the bat.

But if this keeps up, gets a little backwards-compatibility lovin', AMD + ATI will be the defacto Linux hardware. And the hardware's in the right price bracket when the OSes are free.
Comments [0]
[Read Full Story at Phoronix]
Thursday June 19, 2008
Hardware | Posted by Max at 8:27 pm


ATI Radeon HD 4850 Single and CrossFire Mode @ AMD Zone
Our first impression of this card in the limited time we had is that it is amazing ATI put so much power into a single slot card. It does appear to run very hot, at around 155 degrees Fahrenheit by our initial tests but it is a single slot card and we can say the fastest single slot card on the market. A bigger heatsink/fan could have helped but it seems to be quite a powerful package for an amazing price.


@ AnandTech
@ Firing Squad
@ the Guru of 3D
@ Hot Hardware
@ Legion Hardware
@ Legit Reviews
@ PC Perspective
@ the Tech Report
@ techPowerUp! (MSI)
@ techPowerUp! (PowerColor)
@ Tweak Town
@ XtremeSystems

Many of these reviews are shy of complete. AMD lifted their embargo a week ahead of schedule, and many sites didn't even receive their cards (including us) until two days ago, so keep an eye out for the reviews to follow.
Comments [0]
 
Hardware | Posted by Max at 8:15 pm


Nvidia has 9800 GTX+ : 55nm G92 @ bit-tech.net
The current 65nm 9800 GTX will also drop in price below the new 9800 GTX+ to $199, and so we expect the rest of the lower card SKUs like the 8800 GTS 512, 8800 GT and G94 based 9600 GT to also drop in price too! However, Nvidia wouldn't confirm this with us yet. Since the 8800 GTS 512, 8800 GT have already reached end-of-life, and even the 9800 GTX is reported to have followed recently this doesn't seem too far fetched as people already try to clear stock, just a short couple of months after it was launched.

Radeon HD 4850 & GeForce 9800 GTX+ Review @ Firing Squad
As its name implies, the GeForce 9800 GTX+ is an improved version of the original GeForce 9800 GTX. The GPU itself is based on TSMC’s smaller 55-nm manufacturing process, and the 9800 GTX+ runs at higher clock speeds than the GeForce 9800 GTX: 738MHz on the graphics core versus the original 9800 GTX’s 675MHz. Meanwhile, the stream processors run at 1836MHz, an improvement of 148MHz over the 9800 GTX. The memory clock speed remains unchanged at 1.1GHz.

NVIDIA to AMD: Chew on GeForce 9800 GTX+ @ PC Perspective
Sure, you've already heard the news (and probably seen reviews) of AMD's Radeon HD 4850 and 4870 card - we'll have our own review ready very soon. NVIDIA apparently got the news as well and decide to try and put some additional pressure on AMD to perform. The answer: GeForce 9800 GTX+. What the hell?


So this card is definitely going to be faster than an 8800 GTX or Ultra, and cost $200. How cool is that? Let's hope it's quiet, though. The 9800 isn't that great when it comes to efficiency.

Pricing Update:

GeForce GTX 280: $649
GeForce GTX 260: $399
GeForce 9800 GTX+: $229
GeForce 9800 GTX: $199
GeForce 8800 GT 512MB: $169
GeForce 9600 GT 512MB: $149
Comments [0]
 
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next