Quantcast
BROWSE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
General | Posted by Cameron at Jul. 2, 2008 - 12:28 am


Flash-based solid state drives (SSDs) are considered to be the future of performance hard drives, and everyone seems to be jumping on the bandwagon. We are no exception, as we have been publishing many articles on flash-based SSDs during the last few months, emphasizing the performance gains and the potential power savings brought by flash memory. And there is nothing wrong with this, since SLC flash SSDs easily outperform conventional hard drives today (SLC = single level cell). However, we have discovered that the power savings aren’t there: in fact, battery runtimes actually decrease if you use a flash SSD.


Cross another urban legend off your list - even though you won't have any moving parts, a solid state drive won't get you more juice. The SSD's tested were great in the performance category but dropped off in the battery tests. It was interesting to find out that regular drives have varying power consumption depending on how hard they are working. SSD's, in contrast, are powered on or off. You learn new things every day.
[Read Full Story at TomsHardware]
2 User Comments
1 - Posted by Anthony on July 2, 2008 - 10:00 am

That article was pretty flawed, Toms should be ashamed.

2 - Posted by Max Slowik on July 3, 2008 - 11:24 pm

Wait, how so? I'm not disagreeing, I'm just curious.

Add Comment

To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields.

Username: *


Password: (optional)
(Remember my login information: )

Comment: *


What is 3+2?: *