Cogan is not some EV-naysayer wedded to internal combustion. He’s been covering EVs and alt-fuel vehicles since 1992 through his award-winning magazine Green Car Journal. He spent a year living with the pioneering General Motors EV1 electric car, and you’d be hard-pressed to find an alt-fuel car he hasn’t driven. But despite their promise of eco-friendlier mobility, battery-powered vehicles remain cost-prohibitive and will for some time to come, he says.
“There’s a shroud of denial that regularly excludes the real cost of battery electric vehicles from discussion of their considerable benefits,” he says. “I understand first-hand the advantages of an electric car with its high-efficiency, zero localized emissions and petroleum free operation. But I also recognize the importance of an affordable cost so most people can buy them, and that’s a crucial issue that’s rarely, if ever, discussed. People should be asking why.”
Alright, you know how you're not supposed to throw away batteries? They're made of nasty stuff which is why you recycle them--I'm not sure where, I assume the garbage man sorts my trash--and how companies that make batteries are all in Mexico and Canada and places where no one cares about being green, because battery-making byproducts are all nasty...
Imaging a battery the length of a 50 AAs, 100 AAs wide and 50 AAs tall. A quarter million batteries.
That's how big of a douche EV owners are. Smug bastards.
[Read Full Story at
Wired]