|
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB Thumb Drive
Introduction
Corsair's got a cute rubber flash drive on their hands, I gotta say. Black with red and yellow highlights, the GT looks fairly swift. It's ruggedized and water-resistant, without frills, except maybe the blue LED. I like the design, although I do see a couple of points of failure. The rubber cap comes off completely and I lost track of it several times during the review, but at least it's not likely to break if you step on it. Same thing goes for the whole device, actually. Another curiosity is the loop where the lanyard attaches. It's basically a whole punched through the rubber and I'll bet if you tug on it hard it'll snap.  Included with the flash drive was an outdated copy of TrueCrypt, which is open-source data protection software. If you’re interested in it, get the more recent software from that link. It's simple, not too small, and comes with a ten-year warrantee, just in case.  I tested the drive in the most common sensical way: copying files to and from it, timing things with a stopwatch. I tested the read and write speeds four different ways, first with a CD-sized single file, an ISO, to check large file sizes. For medium file sizes, I transferred a folder full of 10MB raw images, for small files, I used a folder of about 1.5MB .jpg images, and for tiny files, I used a folder full of Windows system files averaging 20K each.
680 MB (680 MB Files)
(Show All Graphs)
27.55
27.2
27.2
20
0
MB/s (higher is better)
31.6825
10.79
10.3
9.06
4.59
0
MB/s (higher is better)
31.6825
500 MB (10 MB Files)
(Show All Graphs)
26.31
26.3
21.73
18.51
0
MB/s (higher is better)
30.2565
7.69
7.24
5.43
4.23
0
MB/s (higher is better)
30.2565
250 MB (1.5 MB Files)
(Show All Graphs)
27.7
19.23
17.85
15.63
0
MB/s (higher is better)
31.855
5
2.97
1.98
1.92
0
MB/s (higher is better)
31.855
250 MB (20 KB Files)
(Show All Graphs)
9.25
8.62
8.33
8.3
0
MB/s (higher is better)
10.6375
2.97
1.85
0.66
0.33
0
MB/s (higher is better)
10.6375
As far as performance goes, it's not shabby at any of the read transfer speeds, hanging around 20MB/s for medium and small files, and 8MB/s for tiny and large files. This would be excellent if the speeds were maintained across files of all sizes. Writing is a different story, unfortunately, and the memory stick just barely got around 5MB/s, with much lower transfer speeds for small and tiny files. Conclusion The numbers make this an excellent drive for average-sized files, such as photos and documents, but not great for movies and disk images. Because the read and write speeds are particularly low with tiny files, you probably wouldn't want to use this for booting a live OS from. This is an excellent everyday-type flash drive, best suited for regular use and literally taking your data around with you, without worrying about it getting damaged. 
Related Reviews Thumb Drives July 12, 2009
Thumb Drives June 19, 2009
Thumb Drives April 23, 2009
Thumb Drives January 28, 2005
Add Comment
0 User Comments Add Comment To add a comment without being a member, you may omit the password field, but you must enter your name (or nickname) along with your comment. * Denotes required fields. |
Recent Articles Editorials August 27, 2009
Editorials August 18, 2009
Editorials March 3, 2009
Editorials February 12, 2009
Recent News Inside Bay Area Jan. 29, 2010 - 12:08 am
Ars Technica Jan. 28, 2010 - 11:58 pm
Develop Online Jan. 27, 2010 - 11:48 pm
Rock Paper Shotgun Jan. 27, 2010 - 11:31 pm
Tom's Hardware Jan. 27, 2010 - 11:23 pm
Rock Paper Shotgun Jan. 26, 2010 - 11:56 pm
MSNBC Jan. 25, 2010 - 10:54 pm
cnet Jan. 25, 2010 - 10:27 pm
CNN Jan. 18, 2010 - 11:47 pm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
